Talk:Hikaru Midorikawa
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Hikaru Midorikawa article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
Untitled
editHe weighs 56 pounds?--SUIT 04:22, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
trivia
editthere's a lot of trivia there I think doesn't constitute as trivia and counts more as ... remarkable coincidence. I think it should be removed. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.84.7.84 (talk) 06:58, 2 February 2007 (UTC).
biography
editI find the article going a little overboard about personal matters, while not revealing anything substantial about the CV of the person. Basically, the whole article is one big trivia.
Also, I wonder if an encyclopedia needs honorifics at all, especially 'san'. But if you insist, I say we put shi, referring to an artist we don't know personally. However, I still have my doubts.
About the remarkable coincidence, we could summarize it in a swift and more..well, telegraphic way.
unsourced entries
editWe are gonna' need some sources for all these claims. I've already ran through and tagged every section, I am also inclined to begin removing every single one of them, which is going to annoy some editors, but I am sorry there needs to be proof. If you've got the proof, go ahead and cite it (in the article, not here). -- dsprc [talk] 08:22, 7 August 2014 (UTC)