Talk:Green Senatorial Campaign Committee

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Green Senatorial Campaign Committee. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070927201136/http://ao.nictusa.com/ao/no/060036.html to http://ao.nictusa.com/ao/no/060036.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160303192851/http://query.nictusa.com/cgi-bin/com_supopp/2005_C00428664 to http://query.nictusa.com/cgi-bin/com_supopp/2005_C00428664

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:26, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

Notability

Hello, For the time being, I’ve taken the liberty of removing the “notability” tag at the top of the article, because I believe that at this time the article establishes sufficient notability to justify its removal, for two reasons. The committee:

1. received coverage from Politico and Reason at the time of its accreditation by the FEC
2. marked the first time in American political history that the FEC formally recognized a third party's campaign committee. It continues to be recognized by the FEC

Additionally, the article is now much more in-depth than the articles corresponding to the Democratic and Republican equivalents (though of course I’m not claiming that the GSCC is more notable than they are!).

However, I can certainly see the opposing side here too: there isn’t much independent coverage of the committee after about 2007, and for that matter, the committee's site hasn’t been updated for several years. Therefore, if someone wishes to re-add the notability tag to the article, or to further dispute its notability, I won’t seriously contest it (especially since, in a worst-case scenario, the info could be merged into the main Green Party article).

Thanks for your time, — Historical-idealist (talk) 21:37, 9 March 2021 (UTC)