Talk:G. Sarsfield Ford
This article was nominated for deletion on March 15, 2019. The result of the discussion was no consensus to delete. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on G. Sarsfield Ford. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130915225144/http://newtownbee.com/news/obituaries/2013/05/21/judge-g-sarsfield-ford/137842 to http://newtownbee.com/news/obituaries/2013/05/21/judge-g-sarsfield-ford/137842
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:48, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
Supreme Court
editThere is some discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/G. Sarsfield Ford that the CT Post obituary's brief mention of Supreme Court membership may be a mistake. 24.151.50.175 (talk) 18:14, 23 March 2019 (UTC)
- I think the evidence presented at the deletion discussion is pretty conclusive that this is a mistake. Phil Bridger (talk) 18:19, 23 March 2019 (UTC)
- I've removed the claim, it can always be re-added with a source that none of us can seem to find... Markvs88 (talk) 01:24, 26 March 2019 (UTC)
- He was a judge in the Connecticut State Superior Court. This is like the Circuit Court in Michigan or the "Supreme Court" in New York (New York's top appellate court is the "Court of Appeals"), i.e., the trial court of general jurisdiction. This is by no means the "Connecticut Supreme Court" and anybody who tells you that doesn't know whereof they speak. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 20:09, 31 March 2019 (UTC)
- I've removed the claim, it can always be re-added with a source that none of us can seem to find... Markvs88 (talk) 01:24, 26 March 2019 (UTC)