Talk:Gülen movement

Learn more about this page

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Gülen movement article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1: 90 days

Organizations Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Turkey High‑importance

	Turkey portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Turkey, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Turkey and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TurkeyWikipedia:WikiProject TurkeyTemplate:WikiProject TurkeyTurkey articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Islam Mid‑importance

	Islam portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Islam, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Islam-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IslamWikipedia:WikiProject IslamTemplate:WikiProject IslamIslam-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Religion: Interfaith Mid‑importance

	Religion portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is within the scope of Interfaith work group, a work group which is currently considered to be inactive.

This article has been mentioned by a media organization:

John Lubbock (2021-02-06). "Turkey's pro-gov't media still trying to get Wikipedia banned". Ahval. Retrieved 2021-02-08. So basically the author is complaining that Turkey cannot unilaterally change the name of this page from "Gülen movement to "FETÖ Terrorist Organisation.

Cheating at the Public Service Entry Examinations - In the source article no solid proof is mentioned.

"Algemeen ambtsbericht Turkije oktober 2019 - Ambtsbericht - Rijksoverheid.nl". www.rijksoverheid.nl (in Dutch) (Ministerie van Algemene Zaken). 31 October 2019.

The article above is as the source of the section "Cheating at the Public Service Entry Examinations, 2010" in the references written. However in the English version of the source article there is not any solid proof that can be considered as reliable source for the cheating allegations. The following statement is written in the article:

According to the confidential source, it is widely known that Gülenists had copied exam papers beforehand in order to help other Gülenists into key positions within the Turkish government. (P. 30)

Information from this confidential source can not be an evidence that supports the cheating allegations, since it has neither solid evidence nor any reference that can be counted as reliable source. Moreover the confidential source says that this information is a "widely known" fact but does not mention the scope of the popularity of this information. Widely known by who? By authorities? By people who watch television channels that are in political engagement with that government? Regarding these thoughts a revision and correction of this section strongly suggested.

The Lead-In part is too bloated

Someone needs to shrink those long ass texts and put them in the body of this page instead of shoving everything in the leading paragraphs

Use of Zaman and Today's Zaman as sources

Latest comment: 4 days ago2 comments2 people in discussion

As the article states, these sources are affiliated with the movement so I don't think we can use them as an impartial source for facts. That is not to say they are not useful. Moritoriko (talk) 05:38, 6 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

The sources are clearly useful to counter pro AKP sources as Daily Sabah. Shadow4dark (talk) 07:29, 6 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Add topic