Talk:French battleship Diderot
Latest comment: 12 years ago by Rp0211 in topic GA Review
French battleship Diderot has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||
French battleship Diderot is part of the Battleships of France series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so. | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on July 26, 2012. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the French battleship Diderot briefly participated in the occupation of Constantinople after the end of World War I? | |||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:French battleship Diderot/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Rp0211 (talk · contribs) 20:24, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references):
b (citations to reliable sources):
c (OR):
- a (references):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects):
b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
Infobox
edit- No issues
Lead
edit- No issues
Design and description
edit- No issues
Career
edit- No issues
Notes
edit- No issues
Bibliography
edit- No issues
After thoroughly reviewing this article, I have concluded that it meets the good article criteria at this time. Awesome job and keep up the good work! Rp0211 (talk2me) 21:17, 15 July 2012 (UTC)