Thoroughly Unreliable Entry, from the Encyclopaedia Britannica 1911 which is awful!

edit

100% of the philosophical content of this article (which, inexplicably, is simply lifted from the extraordinarily unreliable Encyclopaedia Britannica of 1911) is incorrect. e.g., Francis apparently followed Duns Scotus's Platonic theory of universals? Pure rubbish! Duns Scotus was not a Platonist about universals. This article either needs to be deleted completely or rewritten from scratch by someone with a clue. This dreadful article has to go! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.111.212.205 (talk) 21:34, 24 March 2015 (UTC)Reply