Talk:Final Fantasy X/X-2 HD Remaster

Cleanup

Cleaned up and rewrote the article a bit. AFAIK, Denkiphile was using the terms "director" and "art director" more generally referring to the entire FF series rather than the remaster alone. The game probably didn't have a director as I've seen some sources erroneously claim Toriyama as such. The closest the remaster had to a director is probably Pan Feng from Virtuos. Removed the composers as it doesn't make much sense listing all five of the original composers when they didn't work on this version. Added the other producers and art directors from Virtuos. The rest is rewording and new info in the text.Xiomicronpi (talk) 23:13, 22 March 2014 (UTC)

What sources claim Toriyama was director of the HD remaster? I've seen only the Square Enix Presents video at E3 2014.Brayden96 (talk) 06:17, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Final Fantasy X/X-2 HD Remaster/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Tezero (talk · contribs) 22:34, 24 June 2014 (UTC)

Yeah, why not; I'll do this one. Beats waiting idly for a call and putting around with neo-Nazis on /pol/ all day. Tezero (talk) 22:34, 24 June 2014 (UTC)

Good Article review progress box

Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV () 3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant () Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

• Is Otaku Study a reliable source?
• One of the sources was missing its publisher; very well formatted otherwise.
• I've added a "See also" to the "Games" section; remove it if you want.
• Oh, and I've also renamed that section "Content" because of the audio stuff. Again, revert if you wish.
• What are dresspheres?
• In the Creature Creator, does the player actually capture human/non-enemy NPCs, or just "recruit" them? In other words, main-series Pokémon, or Pokémon Mystery Dungeon?
• "more people in the younger generation" - unspecific
• "with various people" - whom?
• "reassembling the original assets, approvals and part of the redone high-definition data" - confusing
• "The gameplay needed to be heavily altered to bring it up to high-definition standards while keeping it faithful to the original releases" - Maybe this is all they say in the original source (haven't checked), but I'd expect them to go more in-depth. The reason I want such elaboration is that I don't see how gameplay changes, especially heavy ones, would be necessary for a cosmetic update.
• "It was also successful in North America" - Just the PS Vita version, or both?
• Not a big fan of the reviewer-by-reviewer organization style in Reception (creates/exacerbates arbitrary ordering and repetition), but that's fine for GA.

And... that's it. I'll put this on hold; nothing looks too difficult to hammer out. Take a look at one or both of my GANs sometime if you get the chance. Tezero (talk) 22:53, 24 June 2014 (UTC)

I think I've addressed all the issues, including rewriting and restructuring the Reception section. --ProtoDrake (talk) 08:21, 25 June 2014 (UTC)

Looks good to me. I made a grammatical correction and added a link to the often overlooked Pokémon (video game series) article (it might constitute OR to mention this if the source doesn't - I haven't checked if it does - but I'm not about to hold a GA nomination up for that), but I see no further issues. Tezero (talk) 16:39, 25 June 2014 (UTC)

Open world?

Could this be considered open world?ECW28 (talk) 20:58, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

This is one of the of the most linear JRPGs there are. What would make you think this is open world? Sergecross73 msg me 00:25, 21 March 2015 (UTC)

Supervisors in info box?

The supervisors played a large role in the development of this remaster for obvious reasons and are evidenced by this by being placed very early in the credits. Could we have the supervisors in it? Brayden96 (talk) 05:52, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

If you think that is the case, you should find sources such as interviews and reliable reports on the game's development, then cover the supervisors' exact roles in prose. Anything else is just more conjecture and putting undue weight on some select individuals...again.Xiomicronpi (talk) 20:34, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Final Fantasy X/X-2 HD Remaster. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://eu.square-enix.com/en/blog/final-fantasy-xx-2-coming-ps4-15th-may-2015
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140310090956/http://www.squareenixmusic.com/musicnews2.php?subaction=showfull&id=1388902037&archive=&start_from=&ucat=12& to http://www.squareenixmusic.com/musicnews2.php?subaction=showfull&id=1388902037&archive=&start_from=&ucat=12&

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:42, 30 September 2017 (UTC)