Talk:Eurasian wolf

Any distinguishing features?

Are there any features worthy of mention which distinguish the Eurasian wolf from it's more widely known American counterpart?

eg. Body proportions, behaviour etc.87.102.23.51 18:30, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

Since the term covers all wolves of Europe and many wolves auf Asia, there are at least a few characteristics. The European vary much in size and weight, depending on their environment. The smallest weigh around 20 kg, the biggest around 70 or 80 kg. Than the European are in many cases much more adapted to humans (e.g. breeding in cornfields or near cities) and some have become urban animals to a degree (e.g. in Romania and Italy). There are also differences in history, the "europeans" died out at a much slower rate (because they adapted to humans they didn't die out before the 19th century), in fact Germany has only been wolf-free for around 50 years (there were always some strays from poland, the carpathians or italy) and some settled here on their own. Also interbreeding with doemstic dogs seem to be more common (but this is very controversial). There are probabyl more but it's enough for teh start.--Inugami-bargho (talk) 07:13, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

"more widely known American counterpart", LOL! Biased much? So ridiculous!

Bot report : Found duplicate references !

In the last revision I edited, I found duplicate named references, i.e. references sharing the same name, but not having the same content. Please check them, as I am not able to fix them automatically :)

• "AP" :
  • {{cite web | url = http://www.cosmosmith.com/european_wolves.html | title = European Wolves | work = | publisher = Wolves Of The World | accessdate = 2007-05-11}}
  • {{cite web | url = http://www.anglianwolf.com/d_front_page/articles/conservation/carpathians2003/carpathians2003.htm | title = Wolves in the Carpathians | work = Mary Gray | publisher = Anglican Wolf Society | accessdate = 2007-06-15}}

DumZiBoT (talk) 22:40, 10 August 2008 (UTC)

Basic improvement

I think we should write some more about the subspecies itself, as the article is mostly about comparisons with different subspecies of wolves from North America. Thylacinus cynocephalus (talk) 23:10, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Eurasian wolf. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140325161025/http://www.nuigalway.ie/geography/documents/wolf.pdf to http://www.nuigalway.ie/geography/documents/wolf.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130411134739/http://www.wolfsregion-lausitz.de/verbreitung/verbreitung-in-deutschland to http://www.wolfsregion-lausitz.de/verbreitung/verbreitung-in-deutschland
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130411134739/http://www.wolfsregion-lausitz.de/verbreitung/verbreitung-in-deutschland to http://www.wolfsregion-lausitz.de/verbreitung/verbreitung-in-deutschland

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:58, 24 September 2017 (UTC)

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: rejected by Yoninah (talk) 20:41, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
not a 5x expansion

(

• Comment or view
• Article history

)

• ... that ...? the Eurasian wolf was held in high esteem by the Dacians, who viewed as the lord of all animals and the only effective power against evil? Grumeza, I. (2009), Dacia: Land of Transylvania, Cornerstone of Ancient Eastern Europe, University Press of America, pp.75-6, ISBN 076184466X

• Comment: Since the third week of October is National Wolf Awareness Week I thought it appropriate, even if it wouldn't be posted until later.

5x expanded by Sciencia58 (talk). Nominated by Nall (talk) at 01:30, 23 October 2020 (UTC).

• , @Nall:, when Sciencia58 started expanding the article on 19-October, the article prose already had 14607 characters. Currently it has 18811 characters not amounting to 5x expansion in the last 7 days. I commend Sciencia58 for the work and it seems that with a little more work it can make it to GA and then be nominated again here. Make sure to read the WP:DYKRULES before nominating an article for DYK. Roller26 (talk) 04:49, 24 October 2020 (UTC)

Mythology

There may be some value to re-writing most of the "Myths" section. I've removed two spurious statements and just realised the rest of the paragraph is in need of a lot of TLC as well. As it stands, there's a bunch of nonsense in there. If anyone has some time to help out, it would be greatly appreciated. Trigaranus (talk) 14:13, 20 December 2021 (UTC)

"Mutually intelligible dialects" claim (repost from Talk:Wolf_communication)

> Wolves from different geographic locations may howl in different fashions: the howls of European wolves are much more protracted and melodious than those of North American wolves, whose howls are louder and have a stronger emphasis on the first syllable. The two are however mutually intelligible, as North American wolves have been recorded to respond to European-style howls made by biologists.

The factoid above had been copy-pasted word-for-word around several Wikipedia articles, specifically Eurasian_wolf, Wolf_communication, and Howling.

The claim above originates from Zimen's book 1981 "The Wolf: His Place in the Natural World", specifically the following passage:

> Dave invited me to accompany him on his work. We went to an already known rendezvous, an old clearing in the forest that had become thickly overgrown again, where, upon howling, we were immediately answered by about five cubs and an older animal. I climbed a tree to get a better view, and kept howling in my "European wolf dialect" while the cubs responded in "American." The howling of American wolves is in fact different from that of their European counterparts. I maintained that the howling of European wolves was more protracted and melodious, while that of the American wolves, perhaps because of stronger emphasis on the initial syllables, seemed rather louder. So far as the melodiousness of the howling was concerned, Dave and his colleagues naturally did not agree with me.

> So I sat in the tree and howled, while the others recorded the howling of the cubs on tape. The cubs, attracted by my howling, drew nearer and nearer, and eventually five of them—skinny little fellows about four months old—were sitting under my tree, and we went on howling at each other.

So with a clearer picture of the actual claim, I believe there are several problems with presenting it as fact:

1. Eliciting a reaction by a human does not constitute mural intelligibility, as the animal could have just been confused.
2. Assuming human vocal cords can indeed faithfully replicate canine vocalizations seems rather unwise.
3. Zimen's very colleges have disputed several of the above claims. Presenting it as a fact requires would require consensus.
4. While working with the best data available at the time, early 1980s were the origins of several prominent misinterpretations of wolf behavior, including David Mech's, which by the way is referred to in above passage, pack theory.

I believe the way the claim is presented at the moment does constitute the spread of misinformation. Thus, it should either be reworded to better match with the fact of the matter or be removed, perhaps to be replaced by a more agreed upon and accurate finding.

I refer to [A Brief Lesson on Validating Your Sources (with wolves)](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B4S47jiIdKc) for alerting me to this issue. He was the one who conducted all the research above and presented his findings. When I checked the articles mentioned and did not saw any edits or talk page sections about it, I knew I had to bring forth a discussion. 94.158.81.70 (talk) 05:46, 19 April 2024 (UTC)

Fixed. Mariomassone (talk) 06:10, 20 April 2024 (UTC)