Talk:Envivio

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Software: Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Software, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of software on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SoftwareWikipedia:WikiProject SoftwareTemplate:WikiProject Softwaresoftware articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

California Low‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The references of this article need to be improved for making disappeared the issue at the top. Please help us with that. This is just an informative article for people interested in the video processing software. If you are interested in the market side, go ti the website in the external link. THIS IS NOT ADVERTISING. Please maintain the article in this informative way and don't remove information that could be interesting for some people. Thank you. ≈Marcalsig≈

MarnetteD, I read all kind of rules before adding info to this article. Editor's removing the info probably come from a competitor company of Envivio. That's not politicly correct neither. My article has been reviewed with important press writer to be in an informative way, not in an advertising way. I'll continue adding information about this company, and other companies of the video processing world. That's why know there are just some pages and not as much as what the company that. I'm working on it. ≈Marcalsig≈

The problem is that there don't appear to be any suitable references to use. If the ones used for the awards section are the best that there are then we shouldn't have an article about the company here. I have searched the factiva database to find news articles about the company in reputable newspapers but can't find anything but press releases. Unless I have missed something the company doesn't meet our notability requirements and should be deleted. SmartSE (talk) 21:02, 28 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

Is not a really known company as is very specialised but is a real company and almost important in the world of video software processing, I think that is interesting for people interested in this kind of new technology. Maybe there are not articles in reputable regular newspapers but yes in reputable magazines which are specialised in video. I didn't finished to edit the article jet and I'll put more content and references the next days, but please don't remove it without explaining why. I think some editor's have fun removing things that others had done. . I thought my references where good enough but I'll look for better ones. Also I have a good references you can look at which is the first one. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Marcalsig (talk • contribs) 22:22, 28 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

Add topic