Talk:Elections in Saudi Arabia

Need some media / critical reaction

Have to say the reaction to this has been pretty unfavourable, aside from the few brainwashed people and in-the-dark women's rights groups who think the King owned women in the first place.

• [1]
• [2]
• [3]
• [4]

Sorry, but this announcement is a joke at best, just like elections in Saudi Arabia. Who are you electing besides a person to be bossed by the King? Fact is the county doesn't have a legal right to take away human rights in the first place, and so the King has merely given women one of the basic human rights that he has no right to take away, while simultaneously ignoring others. There is nothing in islam about gender segregation or taking away rights.

Meanwhile, most people who are smart enough to step back and see this for what it is are critical of the move. "Forgive me if I don't bow in gratitude" to quote one HR activist. Why in 3 years instead of in this election? Why not driving? etc... I'd really like to see the article take in some of these sources (and there are plenty more if you search "saudi women vote") - ʄɭoʏɗiaɲ ^τ _¢ 14:25, 27 September 2011 (UTC)

If you think there's enough material to create Women's suffrage in Saudi Arabia as a separate article, or to extend the section in the present article, please go ahead. What would be more encyclopedic than Western mainstream media reactions would be what KSA women themselves are doing in their campaigns for their rights. Boud (talk) 23:11, 15 December 2011 (UTC)

analysis

• http://www.monitor.upeace.org/innerpg.cfm?id_article=834 - a randomly found article with a little analysis - might be useful here. Boud (talk) 23:11, 15 December 2011 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Elections in Saudi Arabia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://www.webcitation.org/63xUk7Xwe?url=http://main.omanobserver.om/node/66706 to http://main.omanobserver.om/node/66706

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:52, 18 September 2017 (UTC)