This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Efforts to impeach Andrew Johnson is within the scope of WikiProject Tennessee, an open collaborative effort to coordinate work for and sustain comprehensive coverage of Tennessee and related subjects in the Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, and even become a member. [Project Articles] • [Project Page] • [Project Talk] • [Assessment] • [Template Usage]TennesseeWikipedia:WikiProject TennesseeTemplate:WikiProject TennesseeTennessee articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject U.S. Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States Congress on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.U.S. CongressWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. CongressTemplate:WikiProject U.S. CongressU.S. Congress articles
A fact from Efforts to impeach Andrew Johnson appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 23 March 2021 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
Latest comment: 3 years ago11 comments4 people in discussion
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
It's an appropriate standalone article because it largely details efforts to impeach Johnson separate from his actual 1968 impeachment. Much like efforts to impeach Donald Trump largely describes efforts to impeach him separate from the two impeachments he actually received. The "previous efforts to impeach" section on the article about Johnson's impeachment did not even exist until after this article (which discusses those efforts in greater detail) was written SecretName101 (talk) 18:16, 5 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
New enough, long enough, and sourced. Hooks are short enough, sufficiently interesting, and supported by citation. No QPQ requirement -- three prior DYKs.
One issue requires attention. Earwig detected a few instances of close paraphrasing with the House History web site (here). Nothing egregious but a little work would be appropriate to address this.
Example 1. Wikipedia: "Around this same time, in 1866, the popular Major General Benjamin Butler, a candidate for the House, regularly denounced Johnson from the stump and called for his removal from office.." House History: "the popular Major General Benjamin F. Butler, at the time a candidate for the House, routinely denounced the President from the stump and called for Johnson’s removal."
Example 2. Wikipedia: "Based upon Ashley’s impeachment resolution, the Judiciary Committee began gathered evidence from witnesses in closed sessions. While the committee did run out of time, with the 39th Congress expiring, they ruled that they had received “sufficient testimony” to continue their investigation in the new 40th Congress." House History: "Working from Ashley’s impeachment resolution, the Judiciary Committee receded from the public spotlight as it gathered evidence from witnesses in closed sessions. Eventually the committee ran out of time and the 39th Congress came to an end. But the committee had gathered “sufficient testimony” to continue the investigation in the new 40th Congress".
Example 3. Wikipedia: "President Johnson kept secret tabs on the House impeachment inquiry through the Pinkerton Detective Agency." House History: "Johnson secretly kept tabs on the House impeachment inquiry using the Pinkerton Detective Agency." Cbl62 (talk) 19:56, 5 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
Example 3. Wikipedia: "...offering Republicans a chance to register their displeasure with Johnson, without actually formally impeaching him." House History: "... allowing Republicans to register their displeasure with the Johnson without committing to impeachment."
I felt I could be a little looser with paraphrasing, since, as a work of an officer of the United States government as part of their job, the work featured on the House of Representatives website is not copyright-protected, and is therefore public domain. SecretName101 (talk) 21:23, 5 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
Improvements made to the paraphrasing issues detected by Earwig. And I hear what the nom says about this being a government work. Still, and as a double-check, it would be good if the queue creator or someone with specialized copyright knowledge were to give this a second look before it appears on the Main Page. Cbl62 (talk) 18:02, 7 March 2021 (UTC)Reply