Talk:Don Getty

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified
Good articleDon Getty has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
August 9, 2008Good article nomineeListed

PC for Privy Council?

edit

At the top of the article, it shows Getty using the "PC" post-nominal, which means he served on the Queen's Privy Council for Canada, although I am unable to find any reference to this, and other facts (such as that he doesn't style himself as "Honourable" any more) lead me to believe he never served on the Privy Council.--RAult 05:58, 17 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Looks like that's been removed now. Good eye.Garth of the Forest 08:55, 3 October 2007 (UTC)Reply


"following his success in negotiating Senate reform as part of the Charlottetown Accord"??

edit

What's that about? There has been no meaningful Senate reform since 1982. The Charlottetown Accord and all of Mulroney's other attempts to mess up what Trudeau accomplished were doomed to fail, and did. Unless you subscribe to the theory that they (Meech, Charlottetown, etc.) were a smokescreen to distract the electorate from what was really going on. Garth of the Forest 08:55, 3 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Grey Cup

edit
 
Getty?

Is this Getty in 1956 drinking out of the Grey Cup? --Skeezix1000 (talk) 18:20, 16 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

It sure looks like him. I couldn't find anywhere online the number he wore, until I came back to Wikipedia, Template:44th Grey Cup confirms he wore 87. I wonder where those numbers came from... 117Avenue (talk) 05:28, 17 December 2011 (UTC)Reply
Good find. I suspected it was him based on a google image search, but it never occurred to me that there was a template with player numbers. --Skeezix1000 (talk) 11:27, 17 December 2011 (UTC)Reply
Good find on the image. 117Avenue (talk) 04:04, 18 December 2011 (UTC)Reply
Um, I can't see that being free - that somebody uploaded it to Flickr with a CC designation does not make it so. Steve Smith (talk) 06:34, 18 December 2011 (UTC)Reply
With over 600 uploads, I believe they are the Toronto archives, who they claim to be. 117Avenue (talk) 06:56, 18 December 2011 (UTC)Reply
At the Toronto Archives' website, it says of this collection that all non-educational use requires written permission of City of Toronto Archives. Anyway, this debate is better had over at the Commons. Steve Smith (talk) 07:00, 18 December 2011 (UTC)Reply
"Um", did you not check the profile of the Flickr uploader? It's quite obviously the City of Toronto Archives, and the Archives' website even links to the Flickr feed.--Skeezix1000 (talk) 02:28, 20 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Image was kept.--Skeezix1000 (talk) 17:08, 3 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Don Getty. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:36, 15 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Don Getty. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:59, 12 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Don Getty. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:04, 9 December 2017 (UTC)Reply