Talk:Demographics of Lithuania

Old talk

Latest comment: 17 years ago10 comments7 people in discussion

Your source for the highest divorce rate in Europe (2004) as being Lithuania's is not completely true. The source actually says that Lithuania tied the Czechs for the same rate of divorce that year. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.160.33.172 (talk) 04:25, 29 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Imo it's a time to upgrade/renew some facts stated here because soem of them here are too old (even 5 years old). As for excample age structure: 0-14 years: 16.1% (male 297,271/female 282,269), 15-64 years: 68.7% (male 1,206,731/female 1,264,359), 65 years and over: 15.2% (male 186,979/female 359,008) (2005 est.)

Please explain where you are getting the adjuted statistics from--nixie 10:45, 3 May 2005 (UTC)Reply

See www.std.lt -> pick English version. You will see yourself that polish figures are false. 85.206.195.99 13:01, 3 May 2005 (UTC)Reply

I've corrected the 2000 CIA factbook ethnic data to reflect the 2001 Lithuanian census. Lysy 17:32, 3 May 2005 (UTC)Reply

The Balts lived between Oder and Vistula rivers and Moscow region. Please don't falsify a history. Zivinbudas 07:57, 8 May 2005 (UTC)Reply

What?! When? Where? Before the Slavs came there? Halibu tt 14:36, May 17, 2005 (UTC)

Exactly. Zivinbudas 09:38, 19 May 2005 (UTC)Reply

Yes that is true. There was a Slavic expansion later and the diminishing of Baltic territory. Similar thing happened to other language groups too, e.g. Celtic which once covered much larger territories than it does now and such, I believe Fino-Ugric was way larger too once if I am correct. I have a map of the changing territory of Baltic tribes. DeirYassin 09:49, 19 May 2005 (UTC)Reply

Hmmm... are there any proofs that the pre-Slavic tribes in those areas spoke Baltic languages? Seems strange, especially that writing arrived to our part of Europe much later... Halibu tt 12:16, May 19, 2005 (UTC)

Did you ever hear such words as toponymy, hydronymy, historical linguistics, historical geography, anthroponymy, archeology, anthropology? No? I see you know only "Historia Polski. Klasa 10. Warszawa, 1935". Zivinbudas 15:02, 19 May 2005 (UTC)Reply

You don't have to offend me, just present arguments. By the way, I've been studying onomastics for quite some time. And I can't think of any notable toponym in the area of Oder estuary that would bear at least distant resemblance to Baltic languages. Perhaps I'm wrong, but you'll need to post at least some examples to convince me. Examples of offensive language do not convince anyone.

As to archaeological findings in the area - I heard of none that would prove your point. Again, I'm not an expert on pre-history of Pomerania, but it seems that it is highly unlikely that there were Baltic tribes there before ca. 6th century, that is before the Slavs came there. There were indeed Prussians and Yotvingians to the east of Vistula, but to the west of it? Unless of course you treat the Rope culture (ca. 3rd millenium BC) to be an example of Baltic tribe, but these lived also in Denmark and northern Germany. Also, the lietuva.lt site confirms what I've been taugth, that the Baltic tribes were pushed by the Goths to the present-day Lithuania from the east in approximately 2nd century. However, these are rather unknown and the first easily recognizable traces of distinct Baltic tribes in the area of modern Baltic states date back to 6th-7th centuries. But where are those Baltic tribes living between Oder and Vistula as well?

As to historical linguistics - I didn't know there were written sources in Baltic languages dating back to 7th century. First written documents in Lithuanian appeared in 16th century, the first Prussian words were mentioned around 1400, Galindian was long gone before it could be put down. The Prussian vocabulary (ca. 800 words altogether) was written in 13th century. So how come you can use historical linguistics to prove that the Balts lived between Vistula and Oder? You can prove that the modern Baltic languages had a common ancestor, but not the geographical distribution of historical languages that were spoken before the writing arrived there.

As to anthropology - the matter is related to archaeology. Please provide some backup. Names of the excavation sites should suffice, I can check them myself. As to historical geography - indeed, I don't know what does this term specifically refer to. Halibu tt 18:58, May 19, 2005 (UTC)

BTW, indeed, the Baltic area was diminished, mostly by Slavic expansion in Masovia and then German drive through Prussia, but in Pomerania? Seems unlikely. Halibu tt

The Balts lived in Pamarė (Pomerania) since 3,000 BC. The territory was to Oder river in the West and at least to Varta and Nuoteka rivers in the South. This is proved by huge amount of Baltic hydronyms and toponyms in this teritory. The most famous hydronyms are mentioned above Varta and Nuoteka rivers and Persantė river in the North. The most famous toponyms are Karwen, Labehn, Labuhn, Powalken, Saulin and Santaka (Santok) - Confluence (English) in confluence of Varta and Nuoteka rivers. German linguist Hermann Schall even claims that Baltic toponyms are to the West of Oder as well - until Elbe river in Saxony and in island of Rugen. He states that name of Berlin is of Baltic origin. These factes are confirmed by archeology as well -> See: Marija Gimbutas. The Balts (you can see and order this book on www.amazon.com). German tribes arrived to Pamarė (Pomerania) only in 8th century BC from Scandinavia and mixed with Pomeranian Balts tribes. They pushed Baltic tribes to the East and Balts retreated to Alna river. In apx. 1th century AD Germans (Goths) left Baltic Sea coast and went to the South-East. Then Balts returned to old places near Vistula, but they didn't exceed Vistula river to the West. Zivinbudas 21:26, 20 May 2005 (UTC)Reply

I would suggest to reconsider the sentence "Lithuania is one of the most literate countries in the world". Is there enough evidence for that? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.110.32.149 (talk) 21:40, 7 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Historical data

Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

It would be nice to have some data on Lithuanian population in history. For example: what was the Lithuanian population in 1945, 1940, 1922, 1918, 1795, 1569 and so on... --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 20:35, 13 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Demographics of Lithuania. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:49, 10 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Demographics of Lithuania. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:27, 8 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:

Population cartogram of Lithuania.jpg

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 00:53, 16 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

Population Pyramid

An update population pyramid of Lithuania is needed for this article to be consistent with other articles about Demographics of countries.Bird Vision (talk)

Add topic