Talk:Cycas revoluta

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified (January 2018)

Sago cycad

edit

"Sago cycad" is at best a minor common name for this species, and one I have never encountered in the botanical or horticultural literature; "sago palm" is a much more familiar name. MrDarwin 15:03, 19 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

It may currently be a minor name, but it is attested (c.1000 google hits), and I consider that an encyclopedia has a duty to educate for the future, not to just perpetuate or encourage historical misconceptions - MPF 09:50, 2 October 2006 (UTC)Reply
Still going down that road, MPF? :o) So let's let the other shoe drop: "sago palm" gets about 33,000 hits vs. the ca. 1000 for "sago cycad". I still say it's not Wikipedia's place to impose a "correct" common name, especially when deciding who or what determines what is "correct" opens such a messy can of worms. MrDarwin 14:55, 2 October 2006 (UTC)Reply
It doesn't have to impose either. Post both names and state that it is not a true palm or even a flowering plant. --Kalmia 06:52, 3 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

Poison

edit

I believe this information should be added to the article:

Thanks (unsigned anonymous ip user) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.79.147.192 (talk) 18:48, 4 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

native to Japan?

edit

what's the stuff they eat in papua new guinea then? --86.149.68.120 17:28, 1 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Taxonomy

edit

This is not a flowering plant. It is a gymnosperm. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Reallyoldplants (talkcontribs) 05:00, 16 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

production of sago?

edit
This line should be removed or have a reference, hole article states this is a very toxic plant.

It is one of several species used for the production of sago, — Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.236.114.204 (talk) 15:32, 25 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Cycas revoluta. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:49, 15 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Cycas revoluta. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:09, 24 January 2018 (UTC)Reply