Talk:Culture shock

Archives (Index)

2013 2014 2019

This page is archived by ClueBot III.

suggestions/dana

It would be helpful to rearrange some portions of the text in order to improve readability and clarity. For example, giving readers a short summary of the key ideas and implications of culture shock in the beginning might make the subject matter easier for them to understand. Furthermore, further details regarding each of the four stages of the Oberg's four phases model might be included for a deeper comprehension even if they are introduced. The "Reverse culture shock" section might benefit from further detail about the difficulties encountered while returning to one's native culture. Additionally, the results of the adjustment phase may be summarized more clearly, and a clear link to culture shock in the "Transition shock" section would be beneficial. All things considered, strengthening the article's organization and delving further into particular facets of culture shock can increase both its thoroughness and reader interest. Danaalmeer (talk) 11:50, 26 October 2023 (UTC)

I agree with what you said. I think it's a great start to an article, but it could use some work developing the four phases and backing it up with more citations and sources. It could also use help with the transitioning work. Other than that, I think it's a great article and has a lot of potential for its growth and expansion. 205.185.107.19 (talk) 04:25, 2 October 2024 (UTC)

Wiki Education assignment: Research Process and Methodology - FA24 - Sect 200 - Thu

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 5 September 2024 and 13 December 2024. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Nutnutt12 (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by Nutnutt12 (talk) 04:34, 10 November 2024 (UTC)