Talk:Crysis (video game)

'Alien attack' image

Here is a game that is praised for having the best graphics in the history of gaming, and yet the screen shot for the plot is of a black void with a glowing green thing in the middle. What happened to the lucious forests, with the dust gently settling on the ground? What happened to the cystal clear waters with the light bouncing of the coral reefs? --Simpsons fan 66 04:18, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

In that image the main character is sky diving out of an airplane, so you are in the middle of the air in the middle of the night. Theres not much to see until you get to the ground. The purpose of the image is to show the alien creature that disrupts the main characters jump, causing him to lose his position with the rest of the team and landing a good distance from the others. Zeroxysm (talk) 17:18, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

I know what the image is, I'm just saying we could have a better screenshot that shows off this game's graphics to their best potential. --Simpsons fan 66 10:38, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

The graphics aren't as good as they were hyped to be; there were complaints that the pre-release screen shots had much, much better graphics that the final game. I have to agree. 213.78.183.91 (talk) 20:50, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

No, the prerelease SS are possible with the current game, its just that there isn't a computer that can currently run it at that setting 71.79.85.191 (talk) 03:15, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

You agree because you're ignorant. The game actually looks better than any of the promotion screenshots, if you crank up the settings (choosing very high is not enough - with manual config editing you can make the game look lightyears better). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.72.233.152 (talk) 20:47, 5 May 2009 (UTC)

Error?

The system requirements section lists the minimum requirements as 2.8GHz for XP or 3.2GHz for Vista. But the recommended sys reqs show 2.2GHz. Is there a reason the recommended is lower than the minimum? Or is this an error?

recommended is a 2.2ghz DUAL core processor, min is for SINGLE core processors.

Actually, the 2.8/3.2 GHz requirement is for a Pentium 4 machine. The requirements are 2.0/2.2GHz for Core based machines. Their website gives separate requirements for AMD CPUs. I'm going to update this section with the full info from the official website. -Athaler (talk) 20:03, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

The 'recommended' reqs are a bit of a joke - everyone who's played Crysis knows that the game requires a next gen machine in order to run it on very high or ultra. I doubt you'd get the game playable with the minimum specs. 99.226.189.64 (talk) 03:21, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

a quick search through many fourms will lead you to another conclusion. many people have been able to get the game to run quite well on computers that are of lower specs than what the minimum requried is, even so far as the geforece 6100s. in any case, on your other point, no. the game has erratic performance, but it is possible to get it to run very well on all very high with a current machine, also, ultra high doesent exist, it is just a designation that people creating custom config files use, but there is no ultra high.

Hacker problems

As of this posting, Crysis is completely overrun with hackers in the online multiplayer. The development team acknowledged it in their announcement of adding punkbuster, and the chat channels are full of players complaining about the issue. I think that justifies being added to the multiplayer section of the article, unless anyone has any objections....? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.171.61.223 (talk) 06:43, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

Only if you can find reliable, third-party sources to back up such a claim. Otherwise, it's original research. Xihr (talk) 01:28, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

Are you completely insane? Crysis is probably the most hacked game on the planet. Reliable, third-party sources? You're nuts —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.178.99.212 (talk) 16:30, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

If what you say is true, then you shouldn't have any trouble finding reliable sources which back up the claim. Xihr (talk) 21:41, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

Sources:

http://www.incrysis.com/forums/viewtopic.php?id=18026 http://www.gamereplays.org/community/index.php?showtopic=330262 http://crysisfreedom.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=146&mode=threaded&pid=942 http://crysisfreedom.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=131&mode=threaded&pid=990 http://www.incrysis.com/forums/viewtopic.php?pid=311511 http://gamersunitednetwork.org/modules.php?name=Forums&file=viewtopic&p=901 http://www.incrysis.com/forums/viewtopic.php?pid=305481 http://crysisfreedom.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=131 http://crymod.com/thread.php?threadid=13207 http://www.crysis-online.com/forum/index.php?topic=17799 http://clanfr.eu/forum/viewtopic.php?pid=417 http://elitestargaming.el.funpic.de/index.php?forum-showposts-37-p1 http://crysisfreedom.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=132 http://www.incrysis.com/forums/viewtopic.php?id=17837

-Mudkips, February 1, 2008 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.86.28.149 (talk) 23:09, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

Random discussion groups hardly constitute reliable sources. Please review Wikipedia's guidelines. Xihr (talk) 21:41, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

-- —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cody-7 (talk • contribs) 11:26, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

Yes cheating has always been a large problem in Crysis -- obvious to anyone who has played it online for a few months. The online community is near deserted (Look at the online server list, it's barren and the game isn't even one and a half years old yet). Up until version 1.2 (Most recent is 1.2.1)the game had no internal file checking or cheat prevention so players could easily extract client-side text files and edit them, and for example making pistols able to destroy tanks in one shot. Not only did Crysis not have in-game cheat protection -- and text files that should have been packed away in DLLs where no one could edit them -- but it had no server-side and client side separation (Called replication?) like other games such as Source engine games which basically means important game files are run on the server only, and clients' versions of the files are ignored. Crysis did not implement this. PunkBuster however did do file checks and did not allow anyone with modified game files to join a PB protected server. For some odd reason, the community refused to use PB on their servers and as a result anyone who could use WinRAR and edit a text file could 'hack'.

As this is generally the census of most Crysis community as the reason to why there are so few players online. This definitely deserves mention in the article. Some could say multiplayer is 50% of a game, and should not be left out. If this was a major problem, caused by players or not, it should be mentioned. As far as references -- do you expect someone to write a book or scientific paper about hacking? So community forums are the best references we're going to get. Multiplayer is community supported anyway, so why are community thoughts inadequate? If someone doesn't add mention of this in the article somewhere, I will. It'd be great if anyone reading this could help find good references for those that would inevitably undo my additions every five minutes. -- Cody-7 (talk) 11:26, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

It still needs reliable sources to cite it, not just original research.  Xihr  09:14, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

I think this should count as a "reliable source". It's the official Crytek complaints thread. If you have a look through it you'll see lots of evidence of hacking on both Crysis and Crysis Wars. Also, you might find the second and third links useful.

http://www.h4x-inc.net http://atom.us.to http://www.mycrysis.com/thread.php?threadid=18965&threadview=0&hilight=&hilightuser=0&page=1 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.194.249.80 (talk) 20:45, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

Input methods

Should we list the Xbox 360 Controller & the Xbox 360 Controller for Windows even though there is absolutely nothing different about them? I wouldn't want someone to read this and think they have to get the one sold specifically for Windows and pay more than they should have to. If they have Vista it will recognize the controller automatically but if they have XP or lower they would need to download drivers for free from Microsoft's website. --The Virginian (talk) 12:36, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

Crysis for Xbox 360?

My freind (he may be lying) says that Crysis could be comming Xbox 360, I mean if tiberium is coming to Xbox 360 and its based on the CryENGING2 than, technically crysis could come to Xbox 360, but untill its confirmed ignore my comment. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gears, Gears, Gears (talk • contribs) 02:51, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

tiberium uses unreal 3, the rumors that it was using ce2 are false. that being said, its POSSIBLE in the same sense that anything is possible, however the devs as well as the publisher has said many times that there is no development on a console version at this time. anyway, to be put on the page it needs to be CONFIRMED first, not speculation. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.241.14.153 (talk) 07:30, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

Crysis is not coming on Xbox 360. The rumour is for ps3 because Crytek games have started employment of ps3 programmers. Although it could be any other game but rumour is that it would be Crysis.

Crysis IS NOT coming for the Xbox360, however it is most likely in development for the PS3. I wrote about it, and guess what - deleted! —Preceding unsigned comment added by SchumiChamp (talk • contribs) 19:38, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

Rumors, both ways. Mr. Yerli has said that there is very little chance of a console port; however, Crytek has been working on a console game for a few years now, so their porting of the CryENGINE2 is logical. This in no way means they are developing Crysis for consoles. · AndonicO Engage. 20:13, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

Crytek is not working on Crysis or anything Cry Engine 2 for PS3 or Xbox 360. They are working on Cry Engine 3 - that's THREE - for the upcoming consoles. Upcoming, as in PS4 and the next Xbox, if there will be one. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.72.233.152 (talk) 20:39, 5 May 2009 (UTC)

It has been confirmed some time ago, Crysis 2 will be released for PC, Xbox 360 and the PS3 [1]. It will be running on the Cryengine 3 as that engine has been optimized for console playability. Still no word with Crysis running on the next-gen set of consoles (if there is a next-gen) but I guess the CE3 would more than handle it.

Arafitos (talk) 23:02, 2 December 2009 (UTC)

Prophet "presumably killed"

Am I the only one who thinks that it is unlikely he dies? There's something strange about him after the aliens drag him off initially, and the fact that he grabs a gun and flies straight back to the island (without you seeing his fate) suggests he's gone off to do some sort of personal mission.

In addition, he seems too.. mystical.. in the aircraft carrier to just go and get himself killed by a nuke. His codename Prophet implies he knows what to do, although that is of course speculation.

However, to remain encyclopedic I don't think we can state that he's probably killed, all we know is that we don't know what happens to him. (217.43.255.179 (talk) 19:02, 21 February 2008 (UTC))

In the final cutscene, Psycho said he can detect Prophet's signal, and that he was "alive and kicking" in the ice sphere. · AndonicO ^Hail! 18:01, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

Disk check/launcher .exe?

Anyone else install Crysis only to find that the ONLY way to launch the game is to insert the DVD-ROM, activate autoplay, and then click on 'Play' on the launcher window? Is there ANY way to create a launcher .exe that can be placed on the desktop, or did EA screw us again? 214.13.173.15 (talk) 22:44, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

you know there are better places to ask this question than the wikipedia discussion page. go to start and the games tab on the right side of the start menu if under vista, if under xp than it should install an icon to your desktop automatically, if no just go into the install folder and make a shortcut of the crysis.exe file in bin32. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.241.14.153 (talk) 09:52, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Sorry bro, there aren't a lot of websites that aren't blocked from our filter here in Iraq, so I asked where I could. Thanks for the tip, I'll give it a whack. 208.79.15.2 (talk) 13:32, 24 February 2008 (UTC) (same guy, different computer)

1-1.5 GB

What does 1-1.5 GB in the requirement stand for? Is it RAM? --Octra Bond (talk) 06:27, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

It's RAM. Added the word in. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gamer007 (talk • contribs) 07:16, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

how come the RAM requirements is more for Vista than XP? TranscendantX (talk) 08:27, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Because maybe Vista requires more RAM to run as an OS than XP? 99.226.189.64 (talk) 03:22, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

i hav to either buy a new RAM or downgrade to XP if i wanna play Crysis TranscendantX (talk) 08:27, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

i think u mean "upgrade" to XP 60.242.116.83 (talk) 06:50, 27 July 2008 (UTC)

No, he means downgrade --Danharibo (talk) 10:54, 30 September 2008 (UTC)

He might -mean- 'downgrade', but that doesn't mean he's using it right. In English, 'downgrade' means 'to make worse'; he must be mixing it up with 'upgrade'. ;) 208.53.123.204 (talk) 08:02, 11 December 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, it is literally impossible to "downgrade" from Vista to XP. It's upgrade. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.72.253.164 (talk) 20:32, 5 May 2009 (UTC)

another review

I suggest adding a reference to the review of crysis by Ben Croshaw, views Crysis as a pretty but "somewhat above average" fps shooter (see the review at http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/Zero_Punctuation#Zero_Punctuation. It's another example to give a more balanced "reception" section, because the other reviews (Gamespot, PC Gamer) are so skewed to the maximum score. Zero Punctuation praises the graphics and nano suit, but critisises the vehicles controlling, the overall lineairity of the game, the game has too many controls and that you need a high end pc. Markus. 130.89.165.44 (talk) 09:22, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

I don't really see the need for this. The article already includes the X-Play review which was sufficiently guarded. Reviews have overwhelmingly been positive but cautious about the ferocious hardware requirements, and that's reflected accurately and reasonably in the current state of the article. Furthermore, this "Zero Punctuation" is hardly as notable as the other, already-included, reviews. Xihr (talk) 21:14, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

That said, parts read like a Microsoft marketing promotion.

--UnicornTapestry (talk) 17:45, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

Zero Punctuation is stupid. He's way too critical, it gets annoying after the second review IMO. He isnt even that funny, and it seems he hates so many video games so much, why does he even have a review segment? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 168.169.28.104 (talk) 18:31, 16 October 2008 (UTC)

Zero Punctuation isn't a serious reviewer. He is just bashing on popular games because they are just that - popular. It's quite childish, and hardly something to be taken seriously. Also, the hardware requirements are COMPLETELY irrelevant to the game itself. Crysis is software, and hardware cannot change how "good" or "bad" it is. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.72.253.164 (talk) 20:35, 5 May 2009 (UTC)

Controversy

There has been some controversy around this game. Some say that the developers withheld certain features from the game in DirectX 9 that are supposedly only possible with DirectX 10. This was reported here: http://www.extremetech.com/article2/0,1697,2222414,00.asp

There is also considerable talk of hackers within the multiplayer gaming community, as mentioned previously. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Somnolence (talk • contribs) 00:15, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

It's also worth noting that it seems more than a few users on blogs and net reviews seem to be commenting that the game seems "short." (I'm reading a lot of people citing 6-10 hour gameplay. I'm a pretty thorough completist-style gamer, but I too thought that the game seemed brief. 70.109.55.138 (talk) 00:12, 23 August 2008 (UTC)

Games these days are getting shorter and shorter (Super Mario world had about 100 hours of gameplay, Call of Duty 4 had 7 hours). Is there an article addressing this issue? if not, we should consider starting one. Paskari (talk) 00:20, 16 September 2008 (UTC)

Languages

Crysis supports English, Turkish and German languages. --144.122.250.137 (talk) 11:23, 16 March 2008 (UTC) log --Ilhanli (talk) 11:24, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

It also supports Korean and was released in Korea. Ironic, isn't it?--119.149.135.39 (talk) 10:03, 13 May 2009 (UTC)

If you mean North Korea yeah, it's ironic. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.23.102.124 (talk) 01:05, 28 September 2012 (UTC)

Company

As far as i know the company belongs to three turkish brothers.. so it can not be said its a German Company.. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.253.4.120 (talk) 00:56, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

The company's headquarters is in Frankfurt and the owners were all born in Germany, but are of Turkish descent. --Daniel J. Leivick (talk) 00:58, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

Indeed, it is a German company, owned by three German speaking Germans, born in Germany with German passports. Anyway, their parents were immigrants from Turkey, thats why their names sound strange. -- 79.192.251.132 (talk) 02:01, 14 July 2008 (UTC)

ATI was founded by three Cantonese-speaking Chinese engineers (none of them was born in Canada), does that make ATI a "Chinese" company? No. And Turkish names don't sound strange, they just sound Turkish.

The German-Turks only own the company. They do NOT develop the games. The developers are all NON-Turks. Most of them are ethnic Germans. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.153.209.137 (talk) 06:59, 23 August 2008 (UTC)

Crytek Company belongs to Turkey, not Germany and its CEO is a Turk, Cevat Yerli but the company set in Germany 81.215.27.195 (talk) 20:26, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

High System Requirements

Why do you keep erasing the section? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.206.139.28 (talk) 13:00, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

I don't know why it got deleted, but put it under the controversy section if you do add it. Paskari (talk) 14:29, 16 September 2008 (UTC)

Agreed. As much as lovers of the game will hate to admit it, the primary noteriety of the game is it's incredible graphics and intense system requirements, but it't barely even addressed in the article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.138.242.150 (talk) 19:41, 30 September 2008 (UTC)

Securom problems

There should be some mention about these, i myself can play the game only when my DVD drive decides that today it's gonna work. This is because of the Securom protection, if you do a search you'll find lots of people with similar problems where the DVD drive can't recognize the disc It is important to point out these things so game publishers will stop using Securom and other systems like it Jaagi (talk) 17:02, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

Companies are not concerned if customers their dvd is unable to recognise all they care is the profits nothing else. Also have you checked Securom article?. --SkyWalker (talk) 17:16, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

Guys, this is not a forum. The talk page of articles is for discussions about improving the article itself.  Xihr  19:08, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

Understood. --SkyWalker (talk) 19:21, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

Jaagi brought up a good point, it should be included in the controversy section of this article. Paskari (talk) 14:32, 16 September 2008 (UTC)

If it is noteworthy enough, then it might be worth mentioning. This does not sound like it passes the test (and at any rate his statement was clearly too POV). All software has problems, and all protection systems cause problems to some extent. There is already an extensive (and probably POV) article on Securom as it is; complaints, no matter how small, don't need to be mentioned in every software package that uses it; that has WP:UNDUE problems.  Xihr  06:19, 18 September 2008 (UTC)

It is noteworthy enough if you bought the damn disk only to discover it won't work on your CD drive. It is noteworthy enough if you have to crack your own legit copy to play the damn thing. It is noteworthy enough if a whole lot of people complain about sound problems and downgrading from Vista/7 to XP seems to be the only viable solution, in a game already criticized for exaggerated hardware demands. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.23.102.124 (talk) 01:10, 28 September 2012 (UTC)

Requirements

Someone had set the minimum RAM for Crysis on Vista to 8GB. It is infact 1.5GB for Vista. Also you only need 12GB on HDD space, not the 120GB someone had edited it to be. I have made these changes, just thought I'd say so.Spartan123209 (talk) 17:56, 14 November 2008 (UTC)

Someone messed with it again and forgot to mention the Vista Requirements. I will fix it.Spartan123209 (talk) 20:29, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

Writing?

Who wrote this article? A fifth grader? It is atrocious, and needs a major rewrite. And this is not even considering the abnormal length of the plot summary. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.194.118.10 (talk) 10:35, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

True. Also the plot summary is way, way too long. WW2 can be summarized shorter.--89.244.217.19 (talk) 15:40, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

I redid a lot of the plot and shortened it by about 3 kb. I just hope it has enough information and makes sense. I might try to shorten the Factions section soon. N Segick (talk) 22:55, 21 June 2009 (UTC)

Both of you, Sofixit.  Xihr  08:06, 27 December 2008 (UTC)

Look at the last sentence of the first paragraph of plot. I think it should me said that you do not know this at the time. I edited a sentence that said that is is assumed that the US and KPA are at war. Prophet said this in the plan in the first level. Who wrote plot, it is horribly in need of a re-write.--75.161.59.58 (talk) 23:14, 2 May 2009 (UTC)

Question regarding the Crysis image

The first screenshot of Crysis, [[2]], is a non-free 800x600 sized image. According to Wikipedia's strict copyright policy shouldn't it, you know, be resized to 300 pixels wide so you practically need a magnifying glass to see it? Since there's been no image left unturned in that regard you better do it, fast. Like everyone else. You're falling behind. You don't want to be the laughing stock because you left this photo ridiculously high resolution do you? Cody-7 (talk) 05:27, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

KPA nano-suit equipped soldiers are "cheap knock-offs"?

It said in the game and in the article (I changed it) that the KPA nano suits are just cheap knock offs! This does not seem true at all. They can take a lot more damage and do the same things as you (such as max power, speed, and strength). With max strength on it takes 4 or 5 punches to bring them down. Before you enter the anti-gravity place one of them knocks you out with one punch. How is this right?--75.161.59.58 (talk) 23:30, 2 May 2009 (UTC)

I'm not sure if the Chinese suits ARE inferior, but when Nomad first encounters the Chinese nano-suits, that's how he describes them. That might not be a direct quote from the game, but he does state that the Chine suits are inferior. kkmic (talk) 11:11, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

I just played that part of the game, and what Nomad says is that the Korean suits "look like cheap knock-offs". So, it seems like he's really knocking the design aesthetics of the KPA suits (which look much less streamlined than the US versions, functionality notwithstanding). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.242.254.30 (talk) 04:42, 11 July 2012 (UTC)

Buy weapons?!?!?!?!

You do not buy weapons in Crysis as it says several times in the article. Who wrote this thing?!?!?! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.161.59.58 (talk) 23:46, 2 May 2009 (UTC)

Piracy rate

Should there been an article describing the "high piracy rate" I remember the makers saying it was 20 pirated copies to 1 bought copy. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.218.191.65 (talk) 09:41, 17 August 2009 (UTC)

What the makers say is of no importance. They have no way of knowing the ratio of illegitimate players to real customers. It is pure speculation. If you insist on mentionning it, you can add something like "Crysis producers (?) have speculated that the ratio of pirated to bought copies of the game is 20:1." if you have a source for that. But I think it would not add value to the article in any way. 69.196.189.185 (talk) 04:38, 10 May 2010 (UTC)

Seperate Page for Crysis 2?

There's been a lot of info released on Crysis 2 already. We're not sure as to the story, but the original Crysis page needs to be updated on release info and it won't fit into the "sequels" category. Looks like it's time to start a new page for Crysis 2. Devs have hinted at a 2010 release date and that's coming up pretty soon.

Arafitos (talk) 23:06, 2 December 2009 (UTC)

You probably have realized it by now, but there is. N Segick (talk) 22:34, 3 November 2010 (UTC)

Shortening of plot section

While the plot is still probably unnecessarily long, are any of the sections that list the separate factions in the game even remotely necessary? They seem to me just to restate what is in the plot section. I'm a little leery of simply going ahead and deleting it all. Maybe a Setting section could be added before the plot that briefly summarizes the different factions? It could probably also siphon a bit off of the plot section so it isn't so large. N Segick (talk) 22:34, 3 November 2010 (UTC)

Followed by

I'd suggest a 'followed by' (crysis 2) entry in the main description bar on the right for ease of use. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.89.165.44 (talk) 11:34, 11 February 2011 (UTC)

PlayStation 3 and Xbox 360

Even if the ESRB and the equivalent Korean ratings board have rated the original Crysis for the PlayStation 3 and Xbox 360, as Crysis isn't yet available on these consoles, isn't it a bit premature to include these consoles in the platforms field of the infobox? Best Regards. DynamoDegsy (talk) 14:01, 27 July 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation

Hi, I was just wondering why this page isn't a disambiguation page. I don't think that the first game of the series is more important than the series as a whole, in this case that is. And if I had to choose which one would be more important, I would go for the series. I think this is a strange move. What do you guys think of this?

With kind regards, Kippenvlees1 (talk) 18:58, 24 August 2012 (UTC)

Delta Force?

Is the team actually a part of Delta Force?

Reason I ask is because I just edited Supersoldier to change the text there. I admit I don't recall when or where, but at some point in the game Psycho is said to have originated from the SAS, and yet he is serving in the same group as Nomad - that would imply that the group recruits from all walks of life, and that Nomad came from Delta Force, but is not now serving with them Chaheel Riens (talk) 13:06, 28 June 2013 (UTC)

"Crysis uses Microsoft's API"...

Microsoft has about a million APIs, this phrase makes no sense.. Divinity76 (talk) 09:57, 24 October 2014 (UTC)

Probably needs to consider the next word in that sentence, "Crysis usese Microsoft's API, Direct3D" ... -- ferret (talk) 11:51, 24 October 2014 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Crysis (video game). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071116105023/http://www.incrysis.com:80/index.php?option=com_content to http://www.incrysis.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=559

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:48, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Crysis (video game). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.incrysis.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=559
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071214233149/http://www.crysis-online.com/?id=344 to http://www.crysis-online.com/?id=344
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071011060247/http://www.atomicmpc.com.au/article.asp?SCID=27&CIID=60160 to http://www.atomicmpc.com.au/article.asp?SCID=27&CIID=60160
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070917105308/http://www.incrysis.com/wiki/index.php/Crysis_Multiplayer to http://www.incrysis.com/wiki/index.php/Crysis_Multiplayer
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.crytek.com/news/news/?tx_ttnews%5Btt_news%5D=126&tx_ttnews%5BbackPid%5D=1&cHash=0cbb148a6b
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080223004305/http://play.tm/wire/cluster/1590706 to http://play.tm/wire/cluster/1590706

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:54, 15 August 2017 (UTC)

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Crysis (video game). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://www.webcitation.org/5w3Rl8Wsw?url=http://www.crymod.com/thread.php?threadid=29356 to http://www.crymod.com/thread.php?threadid=29356
• Added archive https://www.webcitation.org/5w3KaXa0R?url=http://www.shacknews.com/featuredarticle.x?id=224 to http://www.shacknews.com/featuredarticle.x?id=224&page=3
• Added archive https://www.webcitation.org/5w3KJ1dyf?url=http://www.incrysis.com/wiki/index.php/What_is_Crysis to http://www.incrysis.com/wiki/index.php/What_is_Crysis%3F
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.bit-tech.net/blog/2009/12/15/crysis-did-you-upgrade/
• Added archive https://archive.is/20120716144558/http://uk.gamespot.com/news/6321992/crysis-rated-for-360-ps3 to http://uk.gamespot.com/news/6321992/crysis-rated-for-360-ps3
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081004185303/http://games.ign.com/articles/816/816330p1.html to http://games.ign.com/articles/816/816330p1.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:21, 25 January 2018 (UTC)