Talk:Cross-Strait Service Trade Agreement
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Cross-Strait Service Trade Agreement article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Correct, people!
editThe correct English title of this agreement appears to be the Cross-Strait Agreement on Trade in Services rather than the slightly shorter title currently used by the Taipei Times. Source: http://www.ecfa.org.tw/Download.aspx?No=34&strT=ECFADoc
The agreement was signed in June 2013 but at time of writing (February 2014) has not yet been approved by Taiwan's legislature, the Legislative Yuan. --61.63.34.193 (talk) 10:19, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
Translation
edithttp://zh.wiki.x.io/wiki/%E5%85%A9%E5%B2%B8%E6%9C%8D%E5%8B%99%E8%B2%BF%E6%98%93%E5%8D%94%E8%AD%B0 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 116.253.221.79 (talk) 09:21, 19 March 2014 (UTC)
RfC: Is the writing of this page neutral [multiple points of views]?
editFollowing recent political event in Taiwan and associated In The News candidacy", it have been STRONGLY asked by ITN's admin to check this article for its tone. Then, the event would be acceptable for ITN. Yug (talk) 19:21, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
I've done a fairly thorough revision of the article, which I think has removed most of the sins against NPOV. However, to further balance the article, the "Controversy" section needs to be fleshed out with more viewpoints in support of the CSSTA. PortableSun (talk) 14:20, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
- Had a quick play through it and it seems pretty neutral to me (made some changes). Unfortunately it looks like it is a bit late for ITN though. AIRcorn (talk) 08:31, 11 April 2014 (UTC)