The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information.
Please stay calm and civil while commenting or presenting evidence, and do not make personal attacks. Be patient when approaching solutions to any issues. Ifconsensus is not reached, other solutions exist to draw attention and ensure that more editors mediate or comment on the dispute.
This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Internet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InternetWikipedia:WikiProject InternetTemplate:WikiProject InternetInternet
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is part of WikiProject Websites, an attempt to create and link together articles about the major websites on the web. To participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.WebsitesWikipedia:WikiProject WebsitesTemplate:WikiProject WebsitesWebsites
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organized Labour, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Organized Labour on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Organized LabourWikipedia:WikiProject Organized LabourTemplate:WikiProject Organized Labourorganized labour
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Retailing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of retailing on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RetailingWikipedia:WikiProject RetailingTemplate:WikiProject RetailingRetailing
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Human rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Human rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Human rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Human rightsTemplate:WikiProject Human rightsHuman rights
Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
This article has 100kB prose size, which meant it's potentially WP:TOOLONG. There's quite a lot of cruft (quotes, etc) that could be summarized without skewing WP:POV balance or losing important details. There's likely also sections that are simply not notable, like the NHS data use section, not a major controversy IMO.
Articles that are too long are simply not read, so this article is less effecive as a summary of criticisms than it would be if it was concise while still mentioning all notable criticisms. DFlhb (talk) 10:58, 30 September 2022 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 1 year ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Amazon received huge backlash for the sale of “suicide kits:” sodium nitrite, anti-emetics, and “suicide instruction manuals”, all recommended together, which the article does not mention. Calculover26 (talk) 21:56, 16 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 28 August 2023 and 4 December 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Pmahtani27 (article contribs).
Latest comment: 6 days ago2 comments1 person in discussion
There is already WP:POVFORK concern about criticism articles, but a sub-article on criticism of a particular company for a particular issue is highly unusual. The existing criticism article for Amazon is plenty capable of describing the criticism of its environmental impact if summary style is appropriately used (as opposed to dumping every negative thing ever said about the company, which is the current approach). The existence of the sub-article encourages that bad habit. Sdkbtalk06:31, 13 December 2024 (UTC)Reply
.svg){kind=icon}
Not done Please provide your source. Peaceray (talk) 20:57, 17 November 2023 (UTC)
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 28 August 2023 and 4 December 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Pmahtani27 (article contribs).