Talk:Corporate structure
Latest comment: 13 years ago by Ottawahitech in topic Couple of refs to get this artice (re)started
This article was the subject of an educational assignment in 2014 Q1. Further details were available on the "Education Program:University of Toronto Mississauga/CCT110: The Rhetoric of Digital and Interactive Media Environments (W14)" page, which is now unavailable on the wiki. |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Couple of refs to get this artice (re)started
edithttp://smallbusiness.findlaw.com/business-structures/corporations/corporations-structure.html
http://www.investopedia.com/articles/basics/03/022803.asp#axzz1d9HsRtGi
Ottawahitech (talk) 20:45, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
- Interestingly neither of these seems to agree with the current article about what "Corporate structure" means! PamD 23:16, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
- Yes, I agree. However, this article was started in 2007, but before it got a chance to properly evolve it was re-directed to another page and was lost until I "rescued" it recently (I was looking for info on the subject). I believe the person who started the article may have left Wikipedia in frustration, and I would like to see him/her come back and take part in the re-building if at all possible. Ottawahitech (talk) 23:50, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
- I doubt that someone who hasn't edited for over 2 years is likely to come back. Might the article not be better redirected to Organizational structure? PamD 00:26, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
- The existing text probably belongs in Organizational structure. However corporate structure is a distinct subject that should stand on its own. Ottawahitech (talk) 02:28, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
- BTW it is a shame the person who started this article cannot be enticed back. He has contributed to Vietnamese articles on Wikipedia - more of which I am sure would be welcome. Ottawahitech (talk) 02:37, 11 November 2011 (UTC)