Talk:Copper mining in Michigan

Latest comment: 1 year ago by IonlyPlayz2 in topic just added a link to the steamer

About "Fringe Writers"

edit

"Fringe writers have suggested that as much as 1.5 billion pounds of copper was extracted during this period, but archaeologists consider such high figures as "ill-constructed estimates" and that the actual figure is unknown."

This is quite a biased way of writing, and not usual in Wikipedia. It gives the impression that "archaeologists" (presumably scientists?) are united in the view that "high figures" estimated for prehistoric copper mining at Lake Superior are an illusion countenanced only by "fringe writers" which group evidently contains no archaeologists (therefore no scientists?). 1.5 billion pounds of copper mined prehistorically is a high-end estimate. 500 million pounds of copper is more usual. Of course the actual amount is unknown. Nobody left any records known to us. "unknown" includes both of the above estimates as well as higher, in between and lower values, and therefore is not informative. Jwilsonjwilson (talk) 06:55, 29 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Copper divers in Lake Superior?

edit

This would make a nice small addition -- the divers who recover native copper from the lake bottom, for the mineral collector specimen trade. Anyone? TIA, Pete Tillman (talk) 07:35, 29 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Copper mining in Michigan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:12, 13 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

cool! IonlyPlayz2 (talk) 14:33, 15 December 2023 (UTC)Reply