Talk:Colorado Avalanche–Detroit Red Wings brawl
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 2006 May 2. The result of the discussion was Keep. |
It's Notable
editIt is still one of the most memorable brawls in sports history and probably the most memorable in hockey history.
I agree. Perhaps as time goes on, it will mean less. But right now, it continues to be a memorable moment especially for the Avalanche and the Red Wings, a notable hockey rivalry. Theaterdude88 01:17, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
Only One
editI can't believe that this is the only Wikipedia arcticle about an NHL brawl. If someone would add more, maybe, that would be great. 24.83.3.54 22:31, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
Osgood threw Roy down?
editI took out a sentence that stated Osgood threw down Roy. That's nonsense. Osgood was pushing Roy back and so Roy fell against the boards. No one who saw the fight, and is objective, would have said Roy was thrown down. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.240.96.109 (talk) 23:59, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
Requested move 10 May 2016
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: Not Moved - Although not explicit, Wikipedia:Naming conventions (ice hockey) implies titles should include the city name Mike Cline (talk) 16:58, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
Colorado Avalanche–Detroit Red Wings brawl → Avalanche–Red Wings brawl – The Penguins–Islanders brawl was moved back to its original title after undergoing a move such as this, due to the fact that adding the geographical names was wholly unnecessary. This article should follow suit as well. 2601:282:300:98:BD92:F012:50B7:7BBD (talk) 03:07, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
- Support for consistency. ONR (talk) 23:48, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose. The articles for the two teams are not at Avalanche or Red Wings, so I don't see why this should be. The current title is more easily recognizable for people who aren't intimately familiar with hockey team nick names. — Amakuru (talk) 21:47, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- Comment Is there a guideline and/or naming convention you are trying to follow here? Something from the Manual of Style or the Ice Hockey Project perhaps? Rejectwater (talk) 06:50, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
- Oppose delighted that the above was declined WP:RECOGNIZABLE. In ictu oculi (talk) 10:19, 23 May 2016 (UTC)