Talk:Collège de droit in France

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Law schools and colleges in France. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160226164108/http://www.ecolededroit-paris2.com/ to http://www.ecolededroit-paris2.com/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:28, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

Sciences Po

User:LawStudentJam, Sciences Po and HEAD are law schools in the third meaning (see disambiguation pages). This page is not about all the law school in the broad sense in France, but about law colleges in a specific meaning. Thanks --LLMSorbonne (talk) 15:04, 14 February 2019 (UTC)

POV pushing

A user is deleting content with sources. --Ransouk (talk) 15:15, 8 August 2022 (UTC)

Discussion

Ransouk you haven't changed your attitude since the last time: you are deleting other users' content against all rules and imposing your biased point of view by force. Yet we have the same interests and I am convinced that we can work together to improve pages that are in great need of improvement. Tell me which "talk" you want to debate about the content of articles as sources are sometimes linked between several articles.17:19, 1 November 2022 (UTC) Aigurland (talk) 17:19, 1 November 2022 (UTC)

Please avoid personal attacks. The page is good, please avoid deleting sources. --Ransouk (talk) 14:14, 2 November 2022 (UTC)

Ransouk I have deleted bare URLs, which the template refers to, you can check it yourself. And I have not attacked you in any way, on contrary I invite you to consult my last message on the Assas talk where I call for a more serene collaboration (without you constantly calling on the administrators (including when you are objectively at fault) and without you running away from me). Have a nice day. Aigurland (talk) 14:58, 2 November 2022 (UTC)

I do not oppose that change, thanks. --Ransouk (talk) 18:36, 2 November 2022 (UTC)

Thank you very much for taking this first step, Ransouk. We are better than small disputes. Do you have a moment for us to discuss the other sources I have pointed out? Aigurland (talk) 18:44, 2 November 2022 (UTC)

Hi Ransouk, I allow myself to ask you again (the criticisms I have about the relevance of these sources are explained on the talk of Paris 2 Panthéon-Assas University in "sources") Aigurland (talk) 17:26, 10 November 2022 (UTC)

Hello, As El_C told you [1], please avoid having several conversations at the same time on multiple pages. I have trouble understanding the point of asking me if I am open to talk, all the more if the talk is suppose to happen on another page. --Ransouk (talk) 18:49, 10 November 2022 (UTC)