Former good articleCoheed and Cambria was one of the Music good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
November 28, 2007Good article nomineeNot listed
February 1, 2008Good article nomineeListed
November 17, 2008Good article reassessmentDelisted
Current status: Delisted good article


edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 15 external links on Coheed and Cambria. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:41, 11 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

The band member timeline appears to be broken.

edit

There is a big issue on this article's timeline of band members where the dividing lines appear to have gone rogue. I am not personally sure how to fix this, but is there someone that can handle that? NightmareSnake (talk) 18:19, 9 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

Fixed. An ip made an unexplained change a few days ago. Timeline syntax is very sensitive and this happens when things aren't quite right. -- ferret (talk) 18:45, 9 August 2018 (UTC)Reply
I see this has happened before, and I was the one to report it at that time as well. The timeline is broken again. NightmareSnake (talk) 21:35, 25 December 2019 (UTC)Reply
The article was reverted to a state when the table was working, but it didn't seem to update the table image. Editing and submitting the article without any changes seems to have fixed it. Kheto (talk) 11:56, 29 January 2020 (UTC)Reply