Talk:Coal in Europe

Significance

Sparthorse thanks for reading my start of the article [1]. In my opinion this article deserves place in Wikipedia, since there are other equal summary articles, like Renewable energy in the European Union. Wikipedia:Citing_sources and Wikipedia:Verifiability are in my opinion followed. Watti Renew (talk) 17:34, 17 November 2011 (UTC)

The problem with this article, as I outlined in my proposed deletion is that it does not appear to be an attempt to write a neutral article on the subject. Its a polemic that only talks about one particular viewpoint on the subject. In an encyclopedia we always strive to give a balanced perspective and not just write the personal opinions of one editors. While its good that you've followed WP:V its equally important that you follow: WP:NPOV and WP:NOR. Thanks, Sparthorse (talk) 19:50, 17 November 2011 (UTC)

In my opinion I have made a good start here that I am proud of. However, I have understanding in your point of view. At least I have had the same feeling when reading some newspapers or books. In my opinion, it reveals the competitive advantage of Wikipedia: Teamwork. The more there are editors the better opportunity for several new aspects in the article. If you feel there is missing something in the article, please feel free to join to improve it. Watti Renew (talk) 18:02, 18 November 2011 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Coal in Europe. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091025164626/http://www.isa.org.usyd.edu.au/publications/documents/ISA_Nuclear_Report.pdf to http://www.isa.org.usyd.edu.au/publications/documents/ISA_Nuclear_Report.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:14, 27 November 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Coal in Europe. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131016045634/http://webbshop.cm.se/System/TemplateView.aspx?p=Energimyndigheten&view=default&cat=%2FBroschyrer&id=e0a2619a83294099a16519a0b5edd26f to http://webbshop.cm.se/System/TemplateView.aspx?p=Energimyndigheten&view=default&cat=%2FBroschyrer&id=e0a2619a83294099a16519a0b5edd26f

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:04, 9 August 2017 (UTC)