Talk:Cicero (magazine)

Magazines Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Magazines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of magazines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MagazinesWikipedia:WikiProject MagazinesTemplate:WikiProject Magazinesmagazine
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
See WikiProject Magazines' writing guide for tips on how to improve this article.

Politics Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Germany Mid‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Political stance: liberal-conservative

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The term "liberal-conservative" might cause some confusion among English speaking, especially US-American readers, since for them "liberal" and "conservative" are like central political opposites. Here, the term was obviously coined by Germans, and in Germany "liberal" can mean anything from left-wing liberal, civil rights oriented, classically liberal, neo-liberal, class-conscious bourgeois, employer friendly, simply being rich, to libertarian and right-wing-libertarian. "Conservative" on the other side can mean anything from reactionist, bourgeois, petty-bourgeois, to political realist or even carefully progressive. "Liberal-conservative" then might mean something like bourgeois political realism that chooses personal freedom over collectivism and/or solidarity, is not too excited about utopian ideas and knows the value of both wealth and power. English authors might even know a term which can describe this more adequately than "liberal-conservative"? Anyone? - --JakobvS (talk) 10:23, 16 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

The article is unbalanced

Latest comment: 7 months ago3 comments3 people in discussion

The magazine, for example, presents itself as liberal-conservative, although it has been repeatedly criticised as racist and right-wing authoritarian and, for example, as correctly documented in the article, has named Putin as man of the year. Aberlin2 (talk) 18:41, 6 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Then what do you suggest? Because just putting a tag isn't helpful, so what is your suggestion? The page gives both sides and doesn't push any specific view about the title. --Egeymi (talk) 19:11, 6 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Time Magazine has also named Putin man of the year, they've also named Obama, Hitler, Trump, etc. It is obviously not relevant to the description. pipatron (talk) 21:00, 19 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Quick Facts vs. History and contributors

Latest comment: 10 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Under quick facts, Alexander M. is listed as the current editor-in-chief, while the "history and contributors" section lists Christoph S. as the current editor, with Alexander listed as a former chief editor. 173.64.67.65 (talk) 00:45, 22 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Add topic