Talk:Charlotte Motor Speedway/GA1

Latest comment: 13 years ago by Wizardman in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Voices in my Head WrestleMania XXVII 01:13, 26 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  

The tags for citations have not been addressed, and there are some unsourced sections. Since there hasn't been work done on it since the above review, I'm going to fail the article. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 16:19, 5 February 2011 (UTC)Reply