Talk:Campus Reform
 | The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, which has been designated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Campus Reform article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=icon}
This irrelevant newspaper/webiste doesn't need an article
editWhat is the point of this? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.22.209.88 (talk • contribs) 03:33, September 5, 2016 (UTC)
- If you don't think this article should be on Wikipedia, the proper method of getting it removed it to follow the steps listed here instead of repeatedly blanking the page. Feinoha Talk 03:44, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
New York Times story
edithttps://www.nytimes.com/2022/09/07/magazine/arizona-state-university-multicultural-center.html
The Safe Space That Became a Viral Nightmare
An argument at Arizona State’s multicultural center spiraled into a disaster for everyone involved. Who was to blame?
By Sarah Viren
Sept. 7, 2022
... the same semester that Bebout was targeted, at least two other incidents at universities followed a similar trajectory: Campus Reform and similar conservative online sites — and there are a number of them — reported on a supposed transgression, Fox News amplified the story and the National Youth Front began targeting individual professors or college administrators, claiming that white people were facing discrimination. More recently, a survey by the American Association of University Professors found a similar trend: namely that Campus Reform articles often result in harassment and attacks. Of the faculty members surveyed, 40 percent of them had received “threats of harm, including physical violence or death” after being named in an article in Campus Reform, which is listed as a public charity in tax documents by the Leadership Institute, a conservative organization that owns the site. The study found that Black faculty members were disproportionally named in the articles themselves; L.G.B.T.Q. faculty were more likely to be harassed after publication; and prominent research institutions tended to be the primary focus of the website’s ire.
Data Snapshot: Whom Does Campus Reform Target and What Are the Effects?
An influential conservative website’s strategic coverage and its impact.
By Hans-Joerg Tiede, Samantha McCarthy, Isaac Kamola, and Alyson K. Spurgas
AAUP
SPRING 2021
... After witnessing a number of high-profile instances in which stories Campus Reform published on its website were followed by targeted harassment of faculty members—and sometimes even dismissal from their institutions—we became interested in better understanding the subjects of Campus Reform’s stories and what effects those stories have.