Talk:Busou Shinki
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The contents of the Busou Shinki (TV series) page were merged into Busou Shinki on 14 May 2022. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
Pictures
editLooking for a good picture to demonstrate the figures themselves. If anyone wants to add one, go ahead, but remember it needs to fulfill the guidelines for pics. Also, I'm new to the whole Wiki editing thing, so if anyone can show me any mistakes or where I've done things wrong, feel free to show me where I erred.Dshaffer111 (talk) 22:13, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
Future Release Dates
editTo whoever keeps changing the release dates to Wave 11/4, unless you have a source detailed to state it, dont change it! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.163.246.2 (talk) 15:41, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
Split the Buso Shinki Sections into Sub-Articles
editThe Buso Shinki Article is long enough as it is. We do not need too many sections to explain each of the media type. I suggest the sections to be split per Subject.--Bumblezellio (talk) 04:40, 15 October 2012 (UTC)
Unofficial links?
editI am not familiar with any of the links listed under unofficial links. These seem to be random fansites, is there any reason in particular why they should be there? 109.236.4.20 (talk) 05:54, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
- The first link was a dead Flicky group with the newest post from two years ago and the second-newest from five. The second was some private message board. The third was a Chinese message board mislabelled as Japanese, showing that the person who added it didn't take the care to even check what language it was in. These seem highly inappropriate so I'm removing them. 109.236.4.20 (talk) 06:13, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
Regarding the photograph used in the article
editThe photograph being used has a very amateur feel to it, and I feel that the accessories/equipment which define the line being completely excluded results in it misrepresenting what the series is. I think it should be removed and maybe replaced with something official (fair use). Does anyone else have any thoughts on this? 2404:2D00:5000:841:ACC0:803C:1414:8750 (talk) 11:21, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
- Regarding replacing the photo: I have two candidates to propose - A photos from official website either of the Arnval Mk 2 Tempesta from the very last line released, or the original Arnval from the first line. The official website is gone but the pages are archived and usage of them should be covered under fair use (similar to the photo of the Link figure used in Figma (toy)) 2404:2D00:5000:841:ACC0:803C:1414:8750 (talk) 11:32, 20 May 2021 (UTC)