Talk:Burger King Pokémon container recall
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future: |
WikiProject Videogames?
editDoes this really need to be under that project? Just because its about Pokémon, which has videogames, doesnt mean it should be under this project. --Blake (talk) 15:19, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
- Erm, since when does controversy over a product not become relevant to its owner? - The New Age Retro Hippie used Ruler! Now, he can figure out the length of things easily. 16:25, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
- Its owner is Pokemon. This would be more likely to be under Project Anime and Manga then Project Videogames. The Pokeballs were mostlikly Anime-based. It has nothing to do with the Videogames. --Blake (talk) 16:35, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
- Uhh? The anime is owned by a video game company. "It might be based on the anime" =/= "it's definitely not based on the video games". Explain to me why this is not relevant to Nintendo. - The New Age Retro Hippie used Ruler! Now, he can figure out the length of things easily. 16:47, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
- I dont know. I just diddnt understand why it was under the Videogame project. I would understand if it was those little fake-gameboy's with the fake-gold/silver cartridges, but it is a classic Pokéball as seen in the Anime. --Blake (talk) 17:04, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
- Quick question: does that mean every WP:PCP article is also under WP:VG by default? -sesuPRIME talk • contribs 17:33, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
- No, but this article itself does not necessarily separate itself from video games. It's controversy related to Nintendo.
- Also, no, but this begs the question - the anime episodes are clearly related to Nintendo, so should their be a Nintendo anime task force? - The New Age Retro Hippie used Ruler! Now, he can figure out the length of things easily. 21:50, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
- I think Nintendo-related anime is far too specific for its own task force. -sesuPRIME talk • contribs 22:38, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
- Since when did Nintendo own the Anime? That makes no sense at all. Nintendo is a gaming company. That is why the Anime is so off-canon from the games and manga. --Blake (talk) 23:16, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
- Everything Pokémon is owned by Nintendo. -sesuPRIME talk • contribs 23:49, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
- Quick question: does that mean every WP:PCP article is also under WP:VG by default? -sesuPRIME talk • contribs 17:33, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
- I dont know. I just diddnt understand why it was under the Videogame project. I would understand if it was those little fake-gameboy's with the fake-gold/silver cartridges, but it is a classic Pokéball as seen in the Anime. --Blake (talk) 17:04, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
- Uhh? The anime is owned by a video game company. "It might be based on the anime" =/= "it's definitely not based on the video games". Explain to me why this is not relevant to Nintendo. - The New Age Retro Hippie used Ruler! Now, he can figure out the length of things easily. 16:47, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
- Its owner is Pokemon. This would be more likely to be under Project Anime and Manga then Project Videogames. The Pokeballs were mostlikly Anime-based. It has nothing to do with the Videogames. --Blake (talk) 16:35, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
Actually, it is a joint ownership between Nintendo, Game Freak, and Creatures, Inc. ThePRoGaMErGD (talk) 13:36, 31 March 2019 (UTC)
- I would have said that too! QuantumFoam66 (talk) 04:47, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Burger King Pokémon container recall. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090314232549/http://www.consumeraffairs.com/recalls/pokemon_balls2.htm to http://www.consumeraffairs.com/recalls/pokemon_balls2.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:56, 27 July 2017 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion
editThe following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 03:22, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
I worded my explanation a little wrong
editPokémon will always be related to Nintendo, however what I meant to say is Nintendo, the video game company had absolutely no involvement with whatever this thing was. ok QuantumFoam66 (talk) 04:44, 2 August 2024 (UTC)