Talk:Black Stone: Magic & Steel
Latest comment: 1 year ago by Vrxces in topic WP:VG article reassessment (20 September 2023)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
WP:VG article reassessment (20 September 2023)
editThis is a personal template to provide advice in the course of completing a content assessment or reassessment for the WikiProject for video games. It's not a part of the project itself. For formal guidance when creating and editing articles under this project, please consult the project’s content assessment guide and manual of style. The template can be found here.
Category | Flag | Comments |
---|---|---|
Overall | The article contains meaningful content about the subject matter, and is supported by some citations and multiple sections, but falls short in form and content under the manual of style. | |
Layout | The article has sections that generally conforms to the standard layout under the manual of style, but is ordered incorrectly or potentially missing sections that may help improve the article. | |
Lead section | The lead section mostly conforms with the manual of style, but the opening sentence misses key details and/or the paragraph does not summarize the content of the article. | |
Infobox | The article contains an appropriate infobox. | |
Gameplay | The article does not contain an adequate description of the gameplay. | |
Screenshot and cover art | The article does not contain both a screenshot and cover art for the game. | |
Plot | The article does not contain a plot section where one may be useful. | |
Development | The article does not contain a development section, where one may or may not be useful depending on the availability of reliable sources. | |
Reception | The article does not contain a reception section or lacks substantial content in the section. | |
Sources | The article contains reliable sources, but the article's content is not well cited, is heavy on primary sources, or the sources are inconsistently or incorrectly cited. |