Talk:BeautifulPeople.com
Latest comment: 10 years ago by I Feel Tired in topic Article Quality
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the BeautifulPeople.com article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Untitled
editThis entire article is unintelligible and I'm fairly certain it's been vandalized in places. Le Douche? But of course! (talk) 23:48, 23 May 2010 (UTC)
Hoax
editFrom January 4, 2010 until today [1] a hoax [2] was presented as truth [3]. Secdio (talk) 14:32, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
Article Quality
editThis article is terrible and it reads like an advertisement in some places. I've made a few changes but it still needs a good deal of work. I Feel Tired (talk) 00:01, 5 October 2013 (UTC)