Talk:Battlefield Baseball
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Battlefield Baseball article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Battlefield Baseball was a Media and drama good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on May 18, 2006. The text of the entry was: Did you know ...that Battlefield Baseball, a Japanese film, features elements of the sports, martial arts and horror genres, as well as including three musical numbers? |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Failed "good article" nomination
editThis article failed good article nomination. This is how the article, as of November 19, 2024, compares against the six good article criteria:
- 1. Well written?: OK, but needs some grammar and spellcheck work, as well as exansion.
- 2. Factually accurate?: OK, but needs more references for the information that is missing (see below)
- 3. Broad in coverage?: This article is not thorough. It should include promotion of the film, production costs and methods, how much the film made, any DVD release info, soundtrack info, a cast and crew listing and any anecdotes of note about the film. For a good example, see King Kong (2005 film)
- 4. Neutral point of view?: I can see than an effort was made to show point of view, but I added "citation needed" tags to two paragraphs that claim that critics or viewers felt a certain way about the movie, but then doesn't mention or reference proof of this.
- 5. Article stability? Stable, but actually needs more work.
- 6. Images?: Only one, but that is good enough, since most pics associated with movies are going to be copyrighted. You might be able to find an ad, but if not, that's ok.
When these issues are addressed, the article can be resubmitted for consideration. Thanks for your work so far. --Esprit15d 14:10, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Battlefield Baseball. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060513092749/http://www.lacitybeat.com:80/article.php?id=2120&IssueNum=102 to http://www.lacitybeat.com/article.php?id=2120&IssueNum=102
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060424085715/http://seattletimes.nwsource.com:80/html/movies/2001997600_baseball06.html to http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/movies/2001997600_baseball06.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060513092749/http://www.lacitybeat.com:80/article.php?id=2120&IssueNum=102 to http://www.lacitybeat.com/article.php?id=2120&IssueNum=102
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:57, 28 October 2016 (UTC)