Talk:Arabian Knight (character)

Latest comment: 8 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified
edit

Navid is not an Arabic name, rather an Indian/Persian one. Such mistakes by modern writers baffle me... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.229.83.211 (talk) 01:01, 4 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Arabian Knight returns?

edit

I was browsing through new black panther comic and it seems that he is back in his stereotypical glory. I am thinking they brought him back because of the War in Iraq. Lastly, I am wondering if this is the same guy?--169.237.211.80 04:07, 4 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

I wonder if he's on the correct side this time? I'm not entirely sure why they had him fighting for Iraq in their previous 'Desert Storm' story - it was explained within the story but still seemed very odd. Might be worth mentioning that here, actually? --86.144.231.239 22:27, 14 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

Two SHBs?

edit

Not sure why that was done, when only one was needed. The first Arabian Knight didn't do enough to warrant a second box. And seeing as this is the format for 99% of the legacy character pages, it was reverted to a single SHB box. --Basique 04:01, 27 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Arabian Knight (comics). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:21, 16 October 2016 (UTC)Reply