Talk:Anthony Weiner sexting scandals

2015-2016 sexting incident

MUST UPDATE — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.89.37.222 (talk) 04:12, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

I'm guessing that this refers to the media coverage here and elsewhere. It doesn't seem all that notable per WP:NOTNEWS. Weiner says that the exchange of text messages was "obviously a catfish" (ie he realized that he was being set up).--♦IanMacM♦ ^{(talk to me)} 05:39, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

There is also this coverage in the New York Post and elsewhere. This has problems with WP:BLPSOURCES at the moment and needs more mainstream coverage.--♦IanMacM♦ ^{(talk to me)} 06:03, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

"Weiner says that the exchange of text messages was "obviously a catfish" (ie he realized that he was being set up)." -- umm, Weiner can say whatever he likes and be quoted herein but it doesn't negate anything. Quis separabit? 12:26, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

Yeah that doesn't make sense. He says he knows he was catfished, but still sent out a picture with his son in the frame? – Muboshgu (talk) 19:26, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

It's gotten more official with http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/onpolitics/2016/08/29/anthony-weiner-caught-another-sext-scandal/89526640/ most of the rest of the mainstream media picking up and amplifying the story. It is definitely notable, and especially notable since he texted a picture of his erection next to his four year old son, making this entire situation even more distasteful than it previously had been. 50.39.24.148 (talk) 15:12, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

Given that his wife is leaving him, we should include this incident as an update on the original story. – Muboshgu (talk) 16:38, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

"intended separation" according to the most recent sources I've seen; minor difference, of course, but I clarified that in the article until I can find a more definitive source. Xenophrenic (talk) 20:24, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

Looks like another sexting scandal has broken out involving Weiner sexting a 15 year old and mentioning "rape fantasies" according to the [New York Post]; with a follow-up article noting a comment by Governor Cuomo that Weiner could be facing time in prison if convicted. WAVY 10 Fan (talk) 00:52, 22 September 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Anthony Weiner sexting scandals. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150702002145/http://www.nationaljournal.com/the-man-behind-weiner-s-resignation-20110616 to http://www.nationaljournal.com/the-man-behind-weiner-s-resignation-20110616
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://amfix.blogs.cnn.com/2011/06/08/will-rep-weiners-career-survive-the-sexting-scandal
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011/06/16/house-dems-may-boot-weiner-from-committee
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-504943_162-20068717-10391715.html
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.nypost.com/f/print/news/local/full_transcript_of_weiner_news_conference_JxlqpgCFcbffrWKKcwsyLL
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.nypost.com/p/news/local/bitter_tweet_affair_has_co_ed_worn_qCnymOy6zYIBGkdJhLyw1M

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:28, 15 October 2016 (UTC)

Anthony Weiner sexting scandals

Re: Anthony Weiner sexting scandals and Hillary Clinton email controversy. Anthony Weiner is on the front page of every newspaper of record because of the Clinton email connection. You are being silly. Please stop. -- Petri Krohn (talk) 20:55, 30 October 2016 (UTC)

If Weiner is on the front page of every paper, then it should be an easy matter to convey what they are saying about him in this article when you cite those articles. This sentence, which I removed and you restored, tells the reader absolutely nothing about the subject of this article: "On October 28, 2016, FBI Director James Comey advised Congressional leaders that emails which were believed to be found on the devices could contain material relevant to the Hillary Clinton email controversy.". I intend to remove it again unless you can indicate to me in reliable sources why this information belongs in this article instead of the Hillary Clinton email controversy article. Regards, Xenophrenic (talk) 22:22, 30 October 2016 (UTC)

It's unquestionably related to the content of the article, and the connection is obvious unless you are intentionally being obtuse. Don't remove it. Bueller 007 (talk) 22:27, 30 October 2016 (UTC)

I intend to remove it again unless you can indicate to me in reliable sources why this information belongs in this article instead of the Hillary Clinton email controversy article. Care to take a stab at that? What information does that sentence tell the reader about Anthony Weiner? Regards, Xenophrenic (talk) 22:32, 30 October 2016 (UTC)

Okay; gave it a week. Regards, Xenophrenic (talk) 20:44, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

"Twittergate" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Twittergate and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 December 5#Twittergate until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 23:52, 5 December 2022 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 6 November 2024

Change "Wiener" to "Weiner", since the former is an incorrect spelling of Anthony Weiner's surname. 1db6a45cf64efe92 (talk) 02:02, 6 November 2024 (UTC)

 Done Cannolis (talk) 03:41, 6 November 2024 (UTC)