Talk:Amritpal Singh
(Redirected from Talk:Amritpal Singh (activist))
Latest comment: 5 months ago by Extorc in topic Semi-protected edit request on 24 June 2024
 | The contents of the Amritpal Singh manhunt page were merged into Amritpal Singh on 13 April 2023. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
| Amritpal Singh manhunt was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 11 April 2023 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Amritpal Singh. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here. |
 | The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, which has been designated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Amritpal Singh article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: Index, 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 2 days  |
 | The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information. |
| This page is not a forum for general discussion about Amritpal Singh. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Amritpal Singh at the Reference desk. |
 | This article is written in Indian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, analysed, defence) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amritpal is not a khalistani
edit | This section is pinned and will not be automatically archived. |
Bhai Amritpal Singh is a activists who is on a mission to free Punjab from drugs and give Punjab there rights. Amanpreet2004 (talk) 18:56, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
In his speeches, Singh often argues that the demand for Khalistan is absolutely justified. He also seems to hold considerable appeal for his followers.[1]
In another statement, he is quoted as saying, “We lost our (Sikh) empire to the British in 1849 and we are asking for that empire back.”[2]
- -- Kautilya3 (talk) 01:41, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
“Sikhs have been slaves for 150 years. We have developed a slave mentality. First, we were slaves to the British, now we are slaves to the Hindus. The only way we can be totally free is when we have Sikh rule,” he said in Punjabi while addressing a gathering in Behbal Kalan village on the seventh anniversary of the Behbal Kalan ‘killings’ earlier this month.[3]
- -- Kautilya3 (talk) 16:29, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
“Why is Khalistan such a bad thing?,” he said in a TV interview. “We have the right to self-determination and say we want a separate country in a peaceful manner. Why am I being threatened by my home minister for asking for my democratic right?”[4]
- -- Kautilya3 (talk) 09:22, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
- But I agree that the "Khalistani" label has been overblown in the recent round. Until recently, the media has been calling him a "Khalistan sympathiser". Now that the police are chasing him, it has been blown up.
- The main concern is really his tendency to armed militancy, stockpiling arms, and roaming around with armed supporters. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 01:57, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
- Punjab has highest gun possession but lowest gun crime rate in India. Government just fool people by saying not to possess arms so that they can justify their crime to the people. Most of the gun crime happen with unlicensed weapons, and their people only acquire licensed weapons. Independent hawk (talk) 11:30, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
- The term Khalistani is used for anyone who supports the demand of separate state of Khalistan. That is the definition CrusaderForTruth2023 (talk) 13:42, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
- Definition by who? There is no state document that defines who is a Khalistani-it clearly seems to be an arbitrary label without any credible definition. Princhest01 (talk) 14:51, 24 March 2023 (UTC)
- The term Khalistani is used for anyone who supports the demand of separate state of Khalistan. That is the definition CrusaderForTruth2023 (talk) 13:42, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
- Punjab has highest gun possession but lowest gun crime rate in India. Government just fool people by saying not to possess arms so that they can justify their crime to the people. Most of the gun crime happen with unlicensed weapons, and their people only acquire licensed weapons. Independent hawk (talk) 11:30, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
- There is a distinction between changing drug policy and demanding more state autonomy and demanding secession to produce a theocratic ethnonationalist state (Khalistan, Sikh Empire, etc). I as a Sikh also desire to free Punjab of drugs but we must adhere to the principle of neutrality on Wikipedia. PresidentCoriolanus (talk) 05:10, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
References
- ^ Zoya Mateen, Arvind Chhabra, Amritpal Singh: The self-styled preacher raising fears in India's Punjab, BBC News, 28 February 2023.
- ^ Vivek Gupta, What Explains Amritpal Singh’s Mystifying Rise as the New Poster Boy of Radical Sikh Politics?, The Wire, 11 Februay 2023.
- ^ Matharu, Sonal (25 October 2022). "Fiery orator, 'Bhindranwale 2.0' — who's Amritpal Singh, new 'head' of Deep Sidhu's Waris Punjab De". The Print.
- ^ Pallavi Pundir, India Cuts Off Internet to 27 Million People to Catch One Man, VICE News, 22 March 2023.
Surrendered not ARRESTED
editHe was not arrested he surrendered you can see in his videos before surrender 2001:569:7DCF:5400:CD97:57BA:5DE0:A5BA (talk) 15:08, 30 April 2023 (UTC)
- rces clearly state he was arrested after the gurudwara was surrounded and he had to surrender. >>> Extorc.talk 16:01, 30 April 2023 (UTC)
Sikh meaning
editThe following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
do any body know sikh meaning 2409:4055:2DCC:5C38:0:0:EA89:6A08 (talk) 06:44, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
- Sikh are people who always strive to learn new things and was formed by Guru Gobind Singh Ji Jasdeep Sandhu07 (talk) 06:47, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
- Come canonni Jasdeep Sandhu07 (talk) 06:47, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
- Hi, what do you need me for? CanonNi (talk) 06:49, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
- Come canonni Jasdeep Sandhu07 (talk) 06:47, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Reverts
edit@Jattlife121 Donot revert me now without discussion. WP:PUBLICFIGURE states that for Public Figures we simply report what the RS says and not wait for a conviction in incidents and cases. >>> Extorc.talk 07:22, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
- Point to me to the exact the line it says this. Just with Donald Trump trial, nothing was done until a conviction was made. Per other Public Figures that have ongoing trials, they aren't guilty by media until conviction. Have a read yourself of the page "A living person accused of a crime is presumed innocent until convicted by a court of law. Accusations, investigations and arrests do not amount to a conviction".
- I understand you have an unfavourable view of the individual in question as per your edits, but lets wait for other opinions from International Wikipedia members. Jattlife121 (talk) 07:28, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Jattlife121
- See, there is a fundamental flaw in your reasoning. I am demanding we write exactly what the source says.
"Supporters of Amritpal Singh ... vandalised a gurdwara in Jalandhar Monday night. Singh visited various gurdwaras Monday ... as a part of his ongoing state-wide march titled ‘Khalsa Wahir’."
[1]"A group led by Sikh preacher Amritpal Singh ... his supporters broke the furniture at a gurdwara in Biharipur village in protest against the seating arrangement."
[2]
- Sources undoubtedly claim that he participated in violence. Your reference to WP:BLPCRIME is faulty because BLPCRIME deals with inclusion and not tone. Here, there is no doubt that BLPCRIME doesn't apply on Singh and hence the content can be included in the article and that the sources clearly say he participated in violence.
"I understand you have an unfavorable view of the individual in question as per your edits"
, please stick to the merits of the conversation and not involve inclinations. I am following the policy and you should too.- Your second revert of my edit amounts to WP:EDITWAR. Kindly refrain from such actions.
- See, there is a fundamental flaw in your reasoning. I am demanding we write exactly what the source says.
- >>> Extorc.talk 11:58, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
- It seems there you have had a misunderstanding. The individual must be convicted to say "Participated". Trial by the media doesn't work as mentioned per the reference I have given. I think we need to take further action and get a separate opinion that's unbiased both from religious, cultural and national politics relating to the individual. Also you say he participated in violence but it was his supporters per those "Indian sources" so that doesn't even make sense. You need to use wider sources outside of India to obtain a fair overview of the person. If convicted, I'm happy for it to be reversed. Lets get an unbiased look at this ! Jattlife121 (talk) 08:55, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
" The individual must be convicted to say "Participated"
That is incorrect, the sources say he participated, and we follow the sources. I am citing WP policy and guidelines while you fail to do so.
"Also you say he participated in violence but it was his supporters per those "Indian sources"
- Read again"A group led by Sikh preacher Amritpal Singh"
" You need to use wider sources outside of India"
- If a source is reliable, there should be no reason to not use its content when its DUE. The bias you are alleging here doesn't exist. >>> Extorc.talk 10:50, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
- It seems there you have had a misunderstanding. The individual must be convicted to say "Participated". Trial by the media doesn't work as mentioned per the reference I have given. I think we need to take further action and get a separate opinion that's unbiased both from religious, cultural and national politics relating to the individual. Also you say he participated in violence but it was his supporters per those "Indian sources" so that doesn't even make sense. You need to use wider sources outside of India to obtain a fair overview of the person. If convicted, I'm happy for it to be reversed. Lets get an unbiased look at this ! Jattlife121 (talk) 08:55, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Jattlife121
References
- ^ "Members of 'Waris Punjab De' burn chairs, sofas at Jalandhar gurdwara". Indian Express. 13 December 2022. Archived from the original on 14 December 2022. Retrieved 14 December 2022.
- ^ "Supporters of Amritpal create ruckus at gurdwara". The Tribune. 10 December 2022. Archived from the original on 14 December 2022. Retrieved 14 December 2022.
Semi-protected edit request on 24 June 2024
edit | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
In the first line, it says that he is 'radical'. There is no proof that he is radical. The source cited is not a scholarly article. It is just a news site, which is biased towards the Indian state. So he is not radical. And he is not self styled or a preacher. His biggest contribution during the time he has been in Punjab between November 2022 to April 2023 is his activism against drugs. So he is an activist, not a 'self styled preacher'. Gurnisha (talk) 18:49, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. >>> Extorc.talk 19:10, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
