Talk:Amani al-Khatahtbeh
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
editThis article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 23 January 2019 and 13 May 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Meeraoaldhaheri.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 17:10, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Website
editMuslimGirl.com is the website of Amani Al-Khatahtbeh. See here. gobonobo + c 05:37, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Amani Al-Khatahtbeh. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20161024085011/http://www.kitv.com/story/33416656/muslimgirlcom-founder-on-islamophobia-and-the-election to http://www.kitv.com/story/33416656/muslimgirlcom-founder-on-islamophobia-and-the-election
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:25, 3 July 2017 (UTC)
thanks
editthank you tweet Victuallers (talk) 17:13, 27 March 2019 (UTC)
Sourcing issues.
editSome sources in the controversy section are not reliable and seem to go against WP:BLP and other policies. So in the controversy section we have the bold but poorly sourced claim that Amani endorses 9/11 conspiracy theories. It's source is a youtube video by Amani herself which is spoken word poetry. The source itself is not a reliable one and it doesn't make the definitive claim that Amani endorses a conspiracy theory other than what someone analyzed and interpreted from the video. These statements might be against WP:OR and WP:PRIMARY which states that Do not analyze, evaluate, interpret, or synthesize material found in a primary source yourself; instead, refer to reliable secondary sources that do so. Whoever placed that text analyzed and interpreted a primary source themselves but added no reliable secondary source then made a claim (essentially original research). The way the claim is written and sourced right now is irresponsible at best even if it's true. The next issue is that of a source claiming that Muslimgirl.com/Amani plagiarizes. The source is a duo's personal website/blog. Sources like this can't stand as a reliable source for claims especially for a BLP page. I'm planning to remove the claims of plagiarism and of the 9/11 conspiracy theory endorsement as the sources and uncritical leveling of claims is not acceptable as it stands. The information might be placed in the future if it fulfils the criteria like the rest of the section, which is properly sourced, written and attributed. --SlackingViceroy (talk) 01:17, 13 February 2021 (UTC)