Talk:Ajaccio
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Ajaccio article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article contains a translation of Ajaccio from fr.wikipedia. |
Mean Streets
edit"the streets are mean and narrow " - could someone explain to me what a mean street is? BSkliarWard 14:44, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
- mean and narrow means EB 1911. Changed.Dave (talk) 11:23, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
Location Image
editThe location image needs replacing, it's incomplete and is wrong in the first place. 222.164.88.249 (talk) 09:31, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
Shipping Tonnage
editThere is something wrong with this sentence: "The port is accessible by the largest ships, but its accommodation is indifferent. In 1904 there entered 603 vessels with a tonnage of 202,980, and cleared 608 vessels with a tonnage of 202,502."
I feel it is probably the date, 1904. If this date really is correct (as it may be have been taken from Encyclopedia Britannica 1911) then the facts of tonnage are horribly outdated. However, the same sentence does include the phrase "accessible by the largest ships" which makes the 1904 date seem unrealistic.
This just feels like a typo, which perhaps only the original author can rectify.
Idunno271828 (talk) 04:16, 13 December 2007 (UTC)idunno271828
- Thanks. EB 1911. Will be replaced.Dave (talk) 11:22, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
It was not a typo - it came from the 1911 Encyclopedia Britannica. Paragraph deleted as obsolete.
Pronunciation
editIn French, "Ajaccio" is pronounced [aʒaksjo]. Is [ajatʃo] (as currently stated in the article, dating back to an anonymous edit in Feb. 2006) the established English pronunciation? CapnPrep (talk) 19:20, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
Ajaccio - there is a mistake in the article
editThe chart with basic information about Ajaccio shows that it's population is over 650 thousands, when on the whole island (Corsica) lives little over 300 thousands. I guess that the true number of inhabitants of Ajaccio should be 65,883 (not 658,883) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.77.23.217 (talk) 17:41, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on Ajaccio. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080529095833/http://www.interromania.com/media/pdf/benigni/ptolomeu.pdf to http://www.interromania.com/media/pdf/benigni/ptolomeu.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110721001014/http://www.inrap.fr/preventive-archaeology/In_the_News/Press_release/p-1346-Discovery_of_an_Early_Christian_Baptistery_in_Ajac.htm to http://www.inrap.fr/preventive-archaeology/In_the_News/Press_release/p-1346-Discovery_of_an_Early_Christian_Baptistery_in_Ajac.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080624175934/http://www.corse.pref.gouv.fr/scripts/display.asp?P=COhist_liberation to http://www.corse.pref.gouv.fr/scripts/display.asp?P=COhist_liberation
- Replaced archive link http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:http://www.ca-ajaccien.fr/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/DP-parc-relais-mezzana.pdf with https://web.archive.org/web/20131018011332/http://www.ca-ajaccien.fr/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/DP-parc-relais-mezzana.pdf on http://www.ca-ajaccien.fr/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/DP-parc-relais-mezzana.pdf
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/affichTexte.do?cidTexte=JORFTEXT000000593100&fastPos=1&fastReqId=2036940488&categorieLien=cid&oldAction=rechTexte&title=loi%20no%C2%A02002-276%20du%2027%20f%C3%A9vrier%202002
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:11, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Ajaccio. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100126065821/http://www.ajaccio.aeroport.fr/aeroports/ajaccio2.php to http://www.ajaccio.aeroport.fr/aeroports/ajaccio2.php
- Corrected formatting/usage for https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/affichTexte.do?cidTexte=JORFTEXT000000593100
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:28, 28 June 2017 (UTC)