This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Feminism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Feminism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FeminismWikipedia:WikiProject FeminismTemplate:WikiProject FeminismFeminism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Poetry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of poetry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoetryWikipedia:WikiProject PoetryTemplate:WikiProject PoetryPoetry articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
This article is within the scope of the Women in Religion WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Women in religion. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.Women in ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject Women in ReligionTemplate:WikiProject Women in ReligionWomen in Religion articles
This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies articles
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I've re-done the entire article, as the 1911 Encyclopedia Britannica text was wholly inadequate and sexist to boot. Sadly, there's not much out there on AAP, but I believe I've found all major sources. I don't know if the article is beefy enough to warrant GA, but I'm nominating it anyway just to see. Ricardiana (talk) 05:06, 8 May 2009 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
This article is currently nominated for Featured Article status. Please follow the link at the very top of the page to leave comments. Ricardiana (talk) 20:49, 31 August 2009 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 10 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion
It's illiterate, mis-spelt and unencyclopedic:
"Procter never married. Reason unknown because she died as a single young woman, but probably wanted to do more in life then choosing the simple path of becoming an married woman."
As you could easily see by reviewing the article's history,[1] that sentence was both added and reverted just today. FA tend to attract a lot of ill-considered edits. DwpaulTalk 21:43, 16 December 2013 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 4 months ago3 comments2 people in discussion
I am reviewing this article as part of WP:URFA/2020, an initiative to review Wikipedia's oldest featured articles. I am concerned that this article does not include post-2009 sources, which could be used to expand upon the article and make the "Literary career" section more comprehensive. Examples of sources that I found are below:
Gill Gregory, The Life and Work of Adelaide Procter: Poetry, Feminism and Fathers[2]
Karen Dieleman, Religious Imaginaries: The Liturgical and Poetic Practices of Elizabeth Barrett Browning, Christina Rossetti, and Adelaide Procter[3]
S Rogers Transforming the Fallen Woman in Adelaide Anne Procter's “A Legend of Provence”[4]
Cheri Lin Larsen Hoeckley The Dynamics of Poetics and Forgiveness in Adelaide Procter's ‘Homeless’[5]
Emily Harrington The Expiration of Commitments in Adelaide Procter's “Homeward Bound”[6]
Hi! I’d be happy to do it soon-ish as I’m starting a new research project and looking at these sources fits in well with that. Thank you! Ricardiana (talk) 21:00, 28 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
level-5 vital article is rated FA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
.jpg){kind=small}
