Talk:Addepar

Latest comment: 1 year ago by FeralOink in topic Advert tag


edit

The article is tagged appropriately at present. The "overtly promotional tag/ possible spam" {{news release|date=April 2014}} should NOT be removed, as there is nothing that has changed about the company or the article such that removal would be warranted. In fact, deletion would make a lot more sense, but that is always an uphill battle.

To whomever did the article tagging in April 2014: Keep up the good work! I was proud to see that Wikipedia editors recognized what was legitimately notable and what was not.--FeralOink (talk) 23:01, 29 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

90% of the article's content is not remotely appropriate; I'll restore the tag. K.e.coffman (talk) 04:00, 18 November 2017 (UTC)Reply
K.e.coffman, An editor removed the promo later in 2016, your restored it in 2017, but it was since removed with no explanation. I am going to restore it AGAIN, and excise some of the promo inappropriate content. Not sure why such a big fuss is made over Joe Lonsdale... his BLP was recently deleted as non-notable which seemed a reasonable decision.--FeralOink (talk) 16:49, 25 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Promotional Text Removed from page

edit

Since its launch, Addepar’s software platform has gained traction in the wealth advisory marketplace,[1] with partners and potential clients [2] expressing both praise for its capabilities and reservations about the platform’s ambitious product roadmap.

WestportWiki (talk) 20:56, 22 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

References

  1. ^ "Swatting aside 'doubters,' Joe Piazza uses an improbable hook to nab Wells Fargo private bankers -- pent-up Addepar lust". RIABiz. Retrieved 2014-06-12.
  2. ^ "AITVAddepar". Accelerate-IT Ventures. Retrieved 2014-06-12.
The first article has been removed from the website. The second is a parked domain. I am going to restore the promotional tag, see talk page section above.--FeralOink (talk) 16:46, 25 January 2023 (UTC)Reply