2024 Bosnia and Herzegovina floods is part of the WikiProject Bosnia and Herzegovina, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Bosnia and Herzegovina on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.Bosnia and HerzegovinaWikipedia:WikiProject Bosnia and HerzegovinaTemplate:WikiProject Bosnia and HerzegovinaBosnia and Herzegovina
An editor has requested that an image be added to this article. Once the requested image is added, remove the imageneeded parameter from this template.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Weather, which collaborates on weather and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disaster management, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Disaster management on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Disaster managementWikipedia:WikiProject Disaster managementTemplate:WikiProject Disaster managementDisaster management
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Croatia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Croatia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CroatiaWikipedia:WikiProject CroatiaTemplate:WikiProject CroatiaCroatia
Latest comment: 1 month ago4 comments2 people in discussion
As many of you know, most editors despise list-formatted "Reactions" sections, especially the flag icons. These sections should be converted into prose—not a bulleted (flagged) list. Sourcing should not be primary, such as tweets, and should be more than just politicians mouthing platitudes. Abductive (reasoning)20:32, 5 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
There was no need for a wholesale removal. I've restored parts of the info in prose format, since the majority of it was indeed more than just platitudes. It would've been better to check in detail what kind of relief, if any, each country or organisation provided, before deleting the section. DaßWölf17:35, 8 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
I did not remove anything. If users don't want editors removing contentious, unencyclopedic material from articles, the solution is to not put the contentious, unencyclopedic material in the articles in the first place. Abductive (reasoning)06:00, 9 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
Another editor removed the Reactions section, I merely posted here since it's as good a place to continue the discussion as any. The material could well be described as unencyclopedic and WP:UNDUE, but it was in no way contentious and only a single source was primary (in as much as it was announced by the relevant country's state television; there were zero tweets). In particular, a good few sentences described rescue efforts, and more was to be found in the sources linked. It is better to salvage and improve than to WP:BITE. DaßWölf16:47, 30 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
