Talk:2019 24 Hours of Le Mans

Latest comment: 4 years ago by Bcschneider53 in topic GA Review

Clarification needed

edit

@MWright96: the second paragraph of the post qualifying section needs clarification. It states that the Aston Martin received performance changes in the second sentence before contradicting itself in the thirf sentence. I also split the last sentence up, could you please check that it is still true? Thanks, Willbb234Talk (please {{ping}} me in replies) 11:28, 29 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Warm up section - I'm sure he didn't get a lap of 3 minutes. Did you forget the seconds? Willbb234Talk (please {{ping}} me in replies) 11:32, 29 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

@MWright96: The first quotation in the post race section has single brackets. Brackets adding information to a quote should be square (I believe), could you clarify and what's your opinion on this? Thanks, Willbb234Talk (please {{ping}} me in replies) 14:35, 29 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

GA Review

edit
This review is transcluded from Talk:2019 24 Hours of Le Mans/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Bcschneider53 (talk · contribs) 02:13, 4 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

It is a crime that you've had to wait over six months for a review on this. I'll take this up. Should have comments up sometime this weekend. --Bcschneider53 (talk) 02:13, 4 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR): {{GAList/check|}y}
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  

Lead

edit
  • "The round was the last in the 2018–19 FIA World Endurance Championship," is it worth mentioning in the lead that this was the second edition of the 24 Hours of Le Mans to be run during that season?
  • "with 34 of the race's 60 entries contesting the series." I assume the rest are one-off entries or teams from a similar sports car series, but I think a bit more context here might help the reader. *As it is currently worded, it seems confusing; nearly half the field is taking part in the race, which is part of the series, so why are *they* not of the series?

Background

edit

Regulation changes

edit
  • No issues, though I'd maybe consider an additional IC somewhere in the section (I know everything is referenced from the IC at the very end, but it might make it more clear).

Entries

edit
  • No issues

Pre-race balance of performance changes

edit

Testing

edit

Practice

edit
  • No issues

More to come later. --Bcschneider53 (talk) 16:54, 5 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Qualifying

edit

Post-qualifying

edit
  • "It reduced the Aston Martin's turbocharger boost across ever revolution per minute range" I'm not an expert in sports car technology but something doesn't seem right here...

Qualifying results

edit

Warm-up

edit

Race

edit

Sunset to night

edit
  • "Kobayashi increased the No. 7 Toyota's lead over Fernando Alonso to more than a minute due to minor underbody damage to the No. 8 entry" Do we know how the damage was sustained?

Morning to early afternoon

edit

Finish

edit

Post-race

edit

Images, external links, etc. all look good.

Only minor prose issues, will pass when these are fixed. --Bcschneider53 (talk) 21:40, 5 April 2020 (UTC)Reply