Talk:2018 Eritrea–Ethiopia summit
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 2018 Eritrea–Ethiopia summit article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
2018 Eritrea–Ethiopia summit was nominated as a Social sciences and society good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (September 16, 2018). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated. |
A news item involving 2018 Eritrea–Ethiopia summit was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 10 July 2018. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
Commons files used on this page have been nominated for deletion
editThe following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page have been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussions at the nomination pages linked above. Community Tech bot (talk) 03:36, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion
editThe following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. Community Tech bot (talk) 07:21, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
African Union Flag template
editThe current flag template used for the AU is for an outdated flag. Isn't there a template for the new (2010) version? Couldn't somebody make one? I would myself, but I' m not such an experienced Wikipedian.
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:2018 Eritrea–Ethiopia summit/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Power~enwiki (talk · contribs) 21:28, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Rate | Attribute | Review Comment |
---|---|---|
1. Well-written: | ||
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. | ||
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. | Notably absent was Debretsion Gebremichael- this sentence is unsourced, and there's no explanation of why this person's absence is notable. "Notably" is on the words to watch list. | |
2. Verifiable with no original research: | ||
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. | ||
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). | ||
2c. it contains no original research. | ||
2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism. | ||
3. Broad in its coverage: | ||
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. | The "Aftermath" section probably could be updated with developments after mid-July. power~enwiki (π, ν) 21:34, 10 September 2018 (UTC) | |
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). | ||
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. | ||
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. | ||
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: | ||
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. | There appears to be an outstanding copyright concern regarding some of these photos; there is a deletion discussion at Commons. power~enwiki (π, ν) 21:34, 10 September 2018 (UTC) | |
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. | ||
7. Overall assessment. |
The issues with photo licensing are a hard blocker for approving this. There's also far too much weight on (largely-meaningless) immediate reactions by neutral countries, and not enough weight on the aftermath in Ethiopia and Eritrea. power~enwiki (π, ν) 21:48, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
- No response after almost a week on any issue; the "aftermath" section may need too many updates. Closing as failed. power~enwiki (π, ν) 15:43, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
editThe following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 02:07, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
Role of UAE and Saudi Arabia in the peace agreement between Ethiopia and Eritrea
editThe article is silent on the role of UAE and Saudi Arabia in the peace agreement between Ethiopia and Eritrea ?