Talk:2010 Penang dragon boat tragedy

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 2010 Penang dragon boat accident. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100409094717/http://www.kwongwah.com.my:80/news/2010/01/17/90.html to http://www.kwongwah.com.my/news/2010/01/17/90.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:57, 21 September 2016 (UTC)

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:2010 Penang dragon boat tragedy/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk · contribs) 21:35, 11 August 2020 (UTC)

GA Review

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

General

• Should be comprising of policemen... not comprising policemen

 Done WPSamson (talk) 03:19, 14 August 2020 (UTC)

• Should be or get clearance

 Done WPSamson (talk) 03:19, 14 August 2020 (UTC)

• Minor, okay if not changed: Don't have to mention parents name, can just say a parent of a deceased victim

 Done WPSamson (talk) 03:19, 14 August 2020 (UTC)

• • As well, I don't think inquired is the right word and can probably be cut out. There are also some more wording changes needed. Therefore, the sentence can read On 4 November 2010, a parent of a deceased victim revealed that the dragon boat training was unscheduled and conducted due to student requests to a new teacher already interested in joining the training session.

 Done Note that to be clear, it was revealed by the club to parent, not by parent. WPSamson (talk) 03:19, 14 August 2020 (UTC)

• Teacher and student don't need to be linked.

 Done WPSamson (talk) 03:19, 14 August 2020 (UTC)

• Outdoor activities doesn't need to be linked.

 Done WPSamson (talk) 03:19, 14 August 2020 (UTC)

• Camping trip doesn't need to be linked.

 Done WPSamson (talk) 03:19, 14 August 2020 (UTC)