Talk:1 November 1944 reconnaissance sortie over Japan
Latest comment: 8 years ago by Nick-D in topic GA Review
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 1 November 1944 reconnaissance sortie over Japan article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | 1 November 1944 reconnaissance sortie over Japan has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
 | Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on November 1, 2019, November 1, 2023, and November 1, 2024. | |||||||||
| This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GA Review
edit| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:1 November 1944 reconnaissance sortie over Japan/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Zawed (talk · contribs) 05:28, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
I will review this one, comments to follow. Zawed (talk) 05:28, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
Lead
- "...plan many Air raids on Japan...": lower case a for Air.
- Fixed 04:27, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
Background
- wikilink USAAF and recite it in full on first usage as the abbreviation is used later in the article)
- Done Nick-D (talk) 04:27, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
Photo reconnaissance sortie
- wikilink California, Oahu, Kwajalein, Brigadier General, 47th Sentai? If no link for the latter, maybe a note to explain what it is - I assume a squadron or wing?
- I think California would be over-linking given the relevant location there is linked, but I've linked the others.
- "...American airmen took 7000..."; for consistency with the presentation of numbers in the rest of the article, shouldn't it be 7,000?
- Done Nick-D (talk) 04:27, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
Other stuff
- Consider, for sake of presentation, putting the notes into columns (suggestion only).
- Done Nick-D (talk) 04:27, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
- Consider putting an image in? There is one of a F-13 on the B29 page.
- Done. I couldn't find a good and clearly PD one though! Nick-D (talk) 04:27, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
Overall, this article reads well, is fully cited and neutral in tone, and has reasonable coverage of the subject. I will check back on progress in a few days. Cheers. Zawed (talk) 06:20, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks a lot for the review - I'll follow up on your comments tomorrow or over the weekend Nick-D (talk) 10:40, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
- I think that I've now responded to all your comments. Nick-D (talk) 04:27, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
- Yep, looks good Nick, passing as a GA now. Cheers. Zawed (talk) 09:01, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks again Nick-D (talk) 09:16, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
- Yep, looks good Nick, passing as a GA now. Cheers. Zawed (talk) 09:01, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
- I think that I've now responded to all your comments. Nick-D (talk) 04:27, 4 March 2016 (UTC)