Talk:19th SAARC summit

Afghanistan Mid‑importance

	Afghanistan portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Afghanistan, a project to maintain and expand Afghanistan-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AfghanistanWikipedia:WikiProject AfghanistanTemplate:WikiProject AfghanistanAfghanistan articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Bangladesh Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bangladesh, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Bangladesh on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BangladeshWikipedia:WikiProject BangladeshTemplate:WikiProject BangladeshBangladesh articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Bangladesh To-do list:

Add more images to Bangladesh Liberation War and related pages
Clean up Climate change in Bangladesh, it needs a lot of work
Clean up History of Bangladesh after independence, it needs NPOV
Improve Bangladesh back to FA as it was demoted (see discussion)
Improve Bengali language back to FA as it was demoted (see discussion)
Improve Bengalis and related pages
Take a look at the requested articles.
Make a MRT line 3 article.
Extend, add an infobox and a map of New Eskaton to New Eskaton.

Bhutan Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bhutan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Bhutan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BhutanWikipedia:WikiProject BhutanTemplate:WikiProject BhutanBhutan articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

India Mid‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Pakistan Mid‑importance

	Pakistan portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pakistan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pakistan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PakistanWikipedia:WikiProject PakistanTemplate:WikiProject PakistanPakistan articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sri Lanka Mid‑importance

	Sri Lanka portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sri Lanka, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sri Lanka on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sri LankaWikipedia:WikiProject Sri LankaTemplate:WikiProject Sri LankaSri Lanka articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Maldives Mid‑importance

	Maldives portal This article is supported by WikiProject Maldives, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to the Maldives on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, visit the project page.MaldivesWikipedia:WikiProject MaldivesTemplate:WikiProject MaldivesMaldives articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Nepal Mid‑importance

	Nepal portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Nepal, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Nepal-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page and add your name to the member's list.NepalWikipedia:WikiProject NepalTemplate:WikiProject NepalNepal articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Organizations Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

International relations Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Bias

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This is probably the most biased article I recent memory. All your sources are from Indian newspapers. If Sri Lanka has indeed withdrawn, find a Sri Lankan newspaper or government official which has officially stated it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 182.189.108.242 (talk) 07:51, 1 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Barthateslisa threatening to block me for removing Indian POV

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I have added information regarding Sri Lanka, Maldives and Nepal's position on the summit. Barthateslisa without any reason reverted my edits claiming I was involving myself in an "edit war". I'm sorry, but the current version which I updated it more neutral than the version he keeps reverting to. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 182.189.108.242 (talk) 08:36, 1 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Nepal, Maldives and Sri Lanka have not boycotted the summit

Latest comment: 7 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

I have been trying to post this in the article, but the article is being continuously vandalized by Indian wikipedia members who refuse to accept reality. Kindly keep your nationalistic nonsense at home. I have provided the article with neutral sources. Why are my edits being reverted back to an Indian POV?

Pakistan's postponed stand (posted according to Article X, SAARC charter) http://www.voanews.com/a/pakistan-says-saarc-summit-postponed/3532330.html

Nepal's stand (not boycotting) http://www.voanews.com/a/nepal-urges-conducive-enviroment-for-south-asian-summit/3530444.html

Maldives stand (not boycotting) http://www.hindustantimes.com/world-news/the-maldives-calls-for-an-early-date-of-saarc-summit-asks-members-to-convene/story-fdDQQ2E5IxUbauaJUoiLlI.html

Sri Lanka's stand (withdrew according to Article X, SAARC charter) http://www.dailynews.lk/?q=2016/09/30/local/94570

Next time READ before you revert articles. These are NEUTRAL sources, unlike the nonsense Indian biased news sources the editors keep reverting back to. How is this logical? Indians come across as very immature when it comes to anything related to Pakistan. It's almost like they're so over-exicted that superpowers Afghanistan and Bangladesh have boycotted Pakistan while poor countries like China, Russia and Iran are backing it. You Indians need to wake up from your slumber. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 182.189.108.242 (talk) 08:38, 1 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Just how ridiculous are you? You claim that Indian news sources are biased, but you yourself cite an Indian paper (Hindustan Times). And why are you citing United States government-funded VoA? Aren't they the "Great Satan" ? Apparently, everyone is neutral when they say what you want them to say, otherwise they are biased. Your comments here are a joke and clearly reflect your lack of maturity. Speaking of slumber, India has individual states that have a larger GDP than the whole of Pakistan. If you Pakistanis stopped worrying about India and focused on your own nation, the entire history of the last few decades would have been much better for everyone. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.218.130.121 (talk) 15:16, 28 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

I support your stand in the cases of Nepal,Pakistan and Maldives.(I have even incorporated the info about Maldives and the response by Pakistan from your edits.)But your perception about Sri-lanka is probably wrong.Please reread the very article, you yourself cited,about it,without going into a meaningless edit war and kindly approach for consensus!!!Thank you!!!!Aru@baska^{❯❯❯ Vanguard} 15:17, 1 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Add topic