Wikipedia talk:Nationalist editing

Suggestion: You should, maybe, include some reference on issue of using Predatory open-access publishing as legit source for nationalistic impartial editing and POV pushing - journals are often ultimate tool for persuading others that claim/statement one intend to include into article is legit scholarship, therefrom shouldn't be contested.--౪ Santa ౪^99° 23:39, 8 February 2019 (UTC)

British occupation of Palestine 1918

hs 95.153.162.239 (talk) 12:49, 17 October 2023 (UTC)

What nationalost editing is not

This section begins, "Nationalist editing is not promoting a view based on reliable sources ... (bolded in the project page). Promoting a POV in an article flouts NPOV -- I think the intended thrust here is that reporting assertions by reliable sources that might be questionable. whether or not other reliable sources dispute those assertions, is not nationalist editing. That is both wordy and badly constructed, though, and it is not immediately clear how the concept of nationalist editing figures into it. Also, this only one point of several in the section. It strikes me that this section might be better as a list of points with inline clarifications about each point -- something like the format of WP:NOT or WP:ELNO. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 01:53, 30 October 2024 (UTC)