Wikipedia:WikiProject Islam:The Muslim Guild/Articles

Criticism of Islam

The article needs lots of work. --JuanMuslim 03:33, 28 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

This article about the most important aspect of Islam doesn't contain enough information. --JuanMuslim 04:29, 28 October 2005 (UTC) Added some info from imam Ali, sunni source are welcomed. --Striver 02:22, 1 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I've added some new sections to the article. Add any comments you may have to its talk page. --JuanMuslim ^1m 08:08, 25 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

It is the very basic of Muslim faith. Why they have divided it into Sunni/Shia? Even many attributes of Allah consider by Sunni as well as Shia are written ONLY under Shia. Even Quranic Ayats are divided into sects. Can someone look at it and try to get common thing out from Sect sections, so that the sizes of shia/sunni sections could be reduced ? --- Faisal 03:02, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

List of Islamic terms in Arabic

Refer to the talk page on this article to see the pros and cons of adding the term "Allah" to the list. --JuanMuslim 04:33, 28 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Islam

Hi everyone Please read this, it's quite important.

http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/Talk:Islam#A_brief_recap_--_please_read

BrandonYusufToropov 13:00, 28 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hajj & co

I made som changes to Hajj, Ihram, Umrah and Mut'ah of Hajj.

Needs copyediting and aproval from the Sunni pov holders.

--Striver 16:45, 29 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I have further copyedited the Ihram article. --a.n.o.n.y.m^t 19:55, 29 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand your changes on the Hajj article, however, so I have reverted them for now and will clean up the article instead. Thanks --a.n.o.n.y.m^t 19:57, 29 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Could you share your confusion on the Hajj talk page? Thx :) --Striver 20:44, 29 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I've done a lot of work on Hajj, but I'm thinking maybe the categories could be broken up better, especially the "millions" and "fatal" sections. Also, an image on the page might be nice. Ideas? Turnstep 03:09, 31 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I think the category issue was resolved a few days back. This article does not need any more major editing, but smaller fixes are always necessary. --a.n.o.n.y.m^t 19:54, 4 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Actually I think there is an ongoing revert/edit war between Striver and Zora . It is discussed at Mut'ah of Hajj. --a.n.o.n.y.m^t 19:57, 4 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Unless Zora wants to reply to my horribly bad spellt respons, i have nothing more to add to this article. --Striver 04:30, 5 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

List of Muslims

List of Muslim historical figures

NOT created by me --Striver 02:33, 9 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Ali

There are intense ongoing talks regarding this article on it talk page: 05:00, 12 November 2005 (UTC)

I just made some editions, i need some commments and help from co-editors :) --Striver 16:42, 9 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Your new method of referencing books by creating articles for them and then linking is a WASTE of Wikipedia resources. Please stop. You are turning the Ali article into a weird and lumpy bit of Shi'a piety. You are trashing articles right and left. Please STOP. You've made more than 500 edits in the last four days or so. PLEASE STOP. Zora 17:10, 9 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Issue further discussed here

Muhammad bin Qasim

Could you help me out on the Muhammad bin Qasim article? perhaps get the guild members to help out. Once you check the article out you'll know why I'm saying. Check the talk page. of the article. --Street Scholar

Not sure what the date on this item was but in the past few months I have updated the article and associated articles significantly. It still needs some work and I am in the process distilling it from the Cachnama. I think there needs to be a bit of information on the later states centered around Mansura and Multan as well.--Tigeroo 08:58, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Converted Muslim scholars

Just created it. --Striver 15:24, 5 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Western Muslim scholars

Just created it. ---Striver 15:37, 5 November 2005 (UTC)-Striver 15:24, 5 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Islamic scholars

Just created it. --Striver 15:37, 5 November 2005 (UTC)--Striver 15:24, 5 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I merged all of the above scholar articles into this article. Please slow down in article creation. --a.n.o.n.y.m^t 20:33, 5 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

List of Muslim athletes

This article was voted for deletion, but I think we can make it better than the original. --JuanMuslim ^1m 13:49, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The list was speedily deleted. Well, for now, I will add the list as a subpage linked here - List of Muslim athletes.--JuanMuslim ^1m 23:27, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oh great! I forgot how to make subpages. I recreated the article that had been speedily deleted. Ah, I have no times these days. --JuanMuslim ^1m 23:31, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Anonym, you wrote: "merged into other article as discussed." [1]

Where did we discusse that`? O, well, i wont persist... --Striver 16:58, 7 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Islam in the Bible

www.answering-chritianity.org might be a good idea to collect inspiration.

--Striver 02:09, 1 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Just created it, needs lots of work.

--Striver 02:11, 1 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted... *sight* --Striver 02:06, 14 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Ten Promised Paradise

Just created it, its misspeled, can somone fix it?`--Striver 15:58, 3 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Maria al-Qibtiyya

I have some issues with Maria al-Qibtiyya, its inacurate and pov. Anyone feeling intrested in taking a look? --Striver 04:26, 8 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

History of Islam

Islamic conquest of Iran

Hi guys. My name is Fayssal! I am an Arab (as my name tries to say) and of course I am a citizen of the world! Apart from being this and that, I am Svest! However, I see too much bias Vs Arabs there. You can still try to visit the talk page to understand my position and the opposite one. -- Svest 01:19, 30 October 2005 (UTC) ^{Wiki me up}[reply]

He means this: [2] --Striver 03:22, 30 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry for not being able to find the right place! But, Who is HE? -- ^{Wiki me up}

Conquest of Mecca

Just created it. --Striver 16:38, 3 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Just cleaned it up. The quote section really needs to be cleaned up. I'm all for a small annotation of where the quote came from, but that one is pretty messy. Any takers? Turnstep 19:43, 3 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I propose you leave a sugestion on the "standard" section of this page, on the "quran ref" part of it. --Striver 21:19, 3 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Needs more work. --a.n.o.n.y.m^t 00:53, 10 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Mut'ah

Only a stub for now --Striver 03:18, 31 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Mongol Empire

Does this article represent that the mongols, uniqly in history, embraced the conqured lands religon, or do we need a Mongols invaders becoming Muslims article? --Striver 03:36, 1 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

That is far from being unique in history. The tribes that invaded the Roman Empire became Christians, the Manchus became Confucians, Taoists, and Buddhists, etc. Zora 10:33, 5 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, that was a line i heard and stuck... seems like the line was incorrect... Maybe they meant "uniquely (in that large quantities)"?I dont know... Anyhow, isnt it strange that it is not mentioned at all in the article? --Striver 13:49, 5 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Well, their impact was fairly unique.They gave the islamic world that injection of Colour that was somewhat absent prior.It's a worthyarticle f it's own, but, I'm not capable of doing it. --Irishpunktom\^talk 19:35, 11 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Islam in Korea

Islam in Korea could use a lot of work - not cleaning up or wikifying, but in terms of sources and expansion. freestylefrappe 20:27, 8 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I have tagged it for attention because I think that it does require some cleaning. --a.n.o.n.y.m^t 00:51, 9 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Islamic conquest of South Asia

Pro Hindu, Anti-Muslim article attention needed. --Street Scholar

Yes, I have seen these articles before and they are very biased. I am glad that you and others are balancing them. I will help out when I get the time. --a.n.o.n.y.m^t 00:29, 17 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

History of Muslims in Latin America

There should be an article on the subject on Wikipedia. --JuanMuslim ^1m 05:10, 22 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Black Muslims and Latino Muslims

Please help expand the articles on Black Muslims and Latino Muslims. --JuanMuslim ^1m 03:35, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

spherical trigonometry

Islam and flat-earth theories reads:

The scholars who held to the round earth theory used it in an impeccably Islamic manner, to calculate the shortest distance between any given point on the earth and Mecca. This determined the qibla, or Muslim direction of prayer. Muslim mathematicians developed spherical trigonometry in order to make these calculations ^[3].

But that is not reflected in spherical trigonometry. If it is a Muslim that invented it, or they reinveted it, it should be stated in the article, however, im not well versed in that field and dont feel confident in making claims.

--Striver 14:45, 31 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Outline of Islamic and Muslim related topics

Refer to talk page for relevant discussion. --Juan Muslim 02:13, 6 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

This article is going to be deleted unless it gets some keep votes really soon. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Outline of Islamic and Muslim related topics. --Striver 11:19, 21 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Stoning

See the talk page. --Striver 21:59, 3 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Apostasy

I added Torah ref. [4]

The article did not even mention that there was a punishment for apostacy, while the Torah says stoning! --Striver 21:59, 3 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Curses in Islam

Just created it. --Striver 05:42, 5 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I like your idea about Islam in the Bible. That particular article is very relevant to Islam and could be very interesting once completed. This other article seems as if it would be better as part of another article.--Juan Muslim 08:44, 5 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your credit and proposal. I differ on that regard, may i ask what other article you propose it should be merged into, and your motivation of it not meriting its own aricle?

I argue that this single non wiki article justifies having a separate WP article. --Striver 18:35, 5 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

As striver knows I said that same thing about the creation of this article.[5], but since he believes that it should merit its own article, I suggest making a short article and then seeing whether it can be merged into another article. I think that the article as it stands now is innacurate. Thanks. --a.n.o.n.y.m^t 20:29, 5 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Sunnat Allah

Just created it. --Striver 05:56, 5 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Islam and Terrorism: What the Quran Really Teaches About Christianity, Violence and the Goals of the Islamic Jihad

This [6] might be of intrest... --Striver 03:18, 5 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Nasibi

Just created it.--Striver 18:30, 5 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Being the enemy of God, Muhammad and Ahl al-Bayt

I dont see why the topic was Archived, specialy since i sayd "I have lots to say about this, but dont have time right now. Ill tag it for speedie, As a gesture of good faith. Expect me to return to this issue later."

I only agreed to speede it, since not doing so would result in me giving the impresion of not acting in good faith, and that my other sugestion was a meere diversion.

Either was the objection that the titled was POV, wich i answered and did not get a rebutle, or the objection was that it was un-encyclopedic.

It could not have been that it was malplaced, since the correct sugestion would have been to merge it with some other article.

So, could i please be informed on why the article was un-encyclopedic, so i can be educated about that and not do the same misstake in the future?

I do trust that everybody involved knew what the article was about --Striver 16:40, 7 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Qareen

Does anybody know anything about this . Here it says that this thing is discussed in Sura-al-naas too.....I wonder.......also see the deleted versions . Does anybody know where this subject is discussed in Quran or Hadith ?? F.a.y.^{تبادله خيال}^/c 19:46, 5 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Also , sorry if I sound stupid , but I never heard of this . Can anybody tell me where it is practiced & who practices it . F.a.y.^{تبادله خيال}^/c 19:50, 5 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Well this gets weirder & weirder . The whole Category:Islamic mythology is mostly made up of arabian-persian mythology . Can the arabic speaking guys take a look at these articles . F.a.y.^{تبادله خيال}^/c 20:56, 5 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Recall the types of created beings. People, angels, jinn, but not qareen. Actually, the qareen is a type of jinn. You may use google.com to learn more about them. From the link: "The Qareen is the Jinn companion which is assigned to every human being. It is this Jinn which whispers to our base desires and constantly tries to divert us from righteousness. The Prophet (salAllahu alayhi wasalam) said: "Everyone of you has been assigned a companion from the Jinn. The companions asked: Even you O' Messenger of Allah? And the Prophet replied: Even me, except that Allah has helped me against him and he has submitted. Now he only tells me to do good" (Sahih Muslim)--Juan Muslim 02:42, 6 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Qareen: Demon like creature mentioned more in Hadith, mainly that the Prophet Mohamed managed to convert his Qareen into a Muslim. Khamsa means 5 in Arabic

usedwithout encouagment from the Muslim establishment, just a superstetion.--The Brain 23:28, 13 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Uprightness of all Sahaba

Just created it. --Striver 05:53, 5 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
It seems that this subject would be better as part of another article about the sahaba in general. --JuanMuslim ^1m 13:35, 9 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
I will expand it, give me some time :) --Striver 14:16, 9 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Islamic banking

Zoe & his/her understanding of Islamic concepts . F.a.y.^{تبادله خيال}^/c 12:03, 13 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Prostitution

quote:

The English word whore, referring to (female) prostitutes, is taken from the Old English word hōra (from the Indo-European root kā meaning "to like, desire") but usage of that word is widely considered pejorative and prostitute is a less value-laden term.

--Striver 20:08, 17 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Have nobody taken that away yet? --Striver 14:35, 25 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Islamic Internet sites

Its going to be deleted, unless it gets some keep votes really soon. --Striver 18:06, 20 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Islamofascism_(term)

I want to add this [7] to the article, and i have given good arguments for it [8], but im outnumbered. Anyone that feels my arguments are valid? --Striver 04:27, 16 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Arabs and anti-Semitism

Needs atention. --Striver 09:56, 23 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Capital punishment

The Capital punishment article has large sections devoted to Jewish and Christian views, and nothing on the Islamic perspective - would someone knowledgeable about this please add an entry on this? Thank you so much! And if this is a bad place to make this request, I apologise - please leave a message on my talk page telling me where to ask in the future - thanks again! KillerChihuahua 14:53, 24 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Okay I will take a look later. --a.n.o.n.y.m^t 14:55, 24 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Historical Islam-West relations

Should'nt we have a Historical Islam-West relations article? Here is a quote we can use in it:

"If there is much misunderstanding in the West about the nature of Islam, there is also much ignorance about the debt our own culture and civilisation owe to the Islamic world. It is a failure, which stems, I think, from the straight-jacket of history, which we have inherited. The medieval Islamic world, from central Asia to the shores of the Atlantic, was a world where scholars and men of learning flourished. But because we have tended to see Islam as the enemy of the West, as an alien culture, society, and system of belief, we have tended to ignore or erase its great relevance to our own history." ,Prince Charles, lecture at Oxford University.'

--Striver 21:02, 2 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps an alternative title- Islamic world and the Western world, similar in style to the pages comparing religions, por ejemplo, Islam and Judaism. freestylefrappe 21:56, 5 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

A good, idea, ill start by stubing it. --Striver 14:02, 9 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Gues people didnt agree... Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Islamic world and the Western world --Striver 02:05, 14 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Redemption (religious)

Maybe too bold on my part...but I saw there was no article referring to it: Redemption (religious). Maybe this should be merged with Salvation...is there really a difference? freestylefrappe 02:58, 30 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Islamic studies

I made a great deal of work on this article, and also to lots of related articles like islamic scholars. I also arranged many articles in a hierarchy. I hope it is appreciated. --Striver 15:55, 3 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Islamism

I added the definition of some links in the "See also" section, Zora is opposion it. --Striver 14:27, 9 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Asma bint Marwan

Just found it, its in terrible shape. --Striver 21:14, 16 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Abu 'Afak

Just found it, its in terrible shape. --Striver 21:14, 16 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Dhuhr

Can anyone confirm PepsiDrinka's edit to Dhuhr? freestylefrappe 02:38, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Dhuhr and the other obligatory prayers could use a rewrite. Some information such as the fiqh from the schools of thought could be left out. The number of Sunnah rakkah before and after the obligatory prayers differ with people as well. --Ibrahim Noor 05:08, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Ramadan

The Ramadan article may be undergoing some major changes soon, as proposed by me and Striver. It has been suggested that it be split into two articles, one about the calendar month and one about the religious observances during the month. See Talk: Ramadan and post your opinion on the matter. joturner 04:54, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Miracle

Miracle Has Christian and Jewish views, as well as a very stubby Hindu view - no Islamic view. Please add? Thanks much!KillerChihuahua^?!? 19:16, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Muslim Unity

Just created it --Striver 05:26, 17 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Mosque

I did some considerable work on the mosque article today as I thought the original didn't say everything it should have. Some input would be great. joturner 03:00, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Under the other functions the masjid performs. It's written "places where Muslims are supposed to gather for social activities.". Perhaps change to "places where Muslims are able to gather for social activities."? I know it would be nice for all masjids to handle social activities. However that doesn't always work because of desicions the board members make. --Ibrahim Noor 06:32, 26 December 2005 (UTC)

Mosque is an English word for the Arabic Word Masjid. Masjid means the place to perform Sajda. Sajda is bowing towards the Qibla (Al-Ka'aba, in Makkah (Saudi Arabia)) so that the forhead and nose touches the ground.

Mosque is a place where muslims (usually men) perform religious activities. Following are the main religious activities:

1. Offering prayers (Namaz)
2. Zikr ( Reminding/Remembering Allah )
3. Learning ( Gaining Knowledge )

aureagle 1823 hrs, 23 September, 2006AD (Pakistan Time)

Merge or not

Militant Islam , Islamism , Islamist terrorism . Seem to be a lot similar to me . Farhansher 21:23, 25 December 2005 (UTC)

It seems like the three topics are related. However Islamism and Islamist terrorism seem to deal with two different topics, the former about "ultra-conservate" Islam and the latter about violent Islam. The Militant Islam article seems to be an overlap of the other two. Therefore, I think the information from the Militant Islam article should be split among the other two and the article redirected to the Islamism article. joturner 22:02, 25 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

NOT

Islamism is a subject I agree with. However there are some bad apples using the same policies, such as Islamist terrorism and Militant Islam. They should not be merge into one. Islamism is a method that can be achieved without violence.--Ibrahim Noor 06:22, 26 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Userboxes/Religion

Is crescent fine on muslim userbox , or should it be changed with something else , most probably Allah . F.a.y.^{تبادله خيال} ^{^/c} 12:59, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Although the crescent originated from the Ottoman, it has morphed a very common symbol of Islam. In addition, the image of the crescent, although it may be hard to see, has the shahadah in it. Therefore, I think the crescent with shahadah caligraphy should stay. joturner 13:21, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Main Page

How about an article on Hajj and/or Eid-ul-adha for the main page . F.a.y.^{تبادله خيال} ^{^/c}

I guess it would depend on the quality of the article. --JuanMuslim ^1m 20:00, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Badr

Salaams: I'm redoing the Battle of Badr page, and was wondering if someone here who's a good artist could reproduce these maps (Image:Battle of Badr.jpg, Image:Badr Campaign.GIF) which I may have to delete soon? Palm_Dogg 15:40, 23 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm also putting it up for a peer review, so I'd love any comments you guys have. Palm_Dogg 23:57, 24 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Good work on the article. It could become a featured article with some more work. --a.n.o.n.y.m^t 18:56, 25 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Good job to whomever worked hard to make Battle of Badr a featured article. It looks great! Stoa 01:57, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Islam and gambling

How come there is no such article? --Striver 14:34, 25 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Abd

A disaster, needs fixing --Striver 00:35, 13 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Isa

Can i have some comments on this? Thanks --Striver 14:19, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dhimmi

Hamas

POV-biased editors remove all content that speak of the context in which organizations like Hamas take root (occupation, refugee status, water diversion, etc). Needs attention.

Islam and anti-Semitism

At the moment, alleges that the Quran is anti-semitic for calling Abraham a Muslim instead of a Jew. Stress given to actions and policies that imply oppression, none to the positive treatments. -unsigned

The article actually states that Islam is anti-semitic because the Qur'an calls Abraham a Muslim and not a Jew. The article is nothing but a series of indictments against Islam using the personal opinions of the editors. Weasel words and rhetoric are being used to make it apparent that the Qur'an considers all Jews "monkeys and pigs". Amibidhrohi 15:09, 6 June 2006 (UTC).[reply]

Bro, im so sick of those Islam haters that i have troble caring. If you need support in any specific issue, just tell me, you know my stance. If you need a revert or a opinion or anything. --Striver 16:38, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Zionism

Islamophobia

Islam in the United States

Hujum

I started it today - about Muslims, not Islam though --Irishpunktom\^talk 17:29, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Good work! --Striver 19:22, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Muhammad

They are about to unprotect Muhammad article. Please give you vote against unprotection at here. They want to put wrong introduction there that is.

"Muhammad (محمد (help·info) also Mohammed and other variants), (Turkish: Muhammed) (c. 571–632) established the religion of Islam and the Muslim community (ummah). [footnote] Muslims believe that he was God's final prophet, to whom the Qur'an was revealed.".

Please stop the unprotection. In case the article is unprotected then please keep it in you watch so that you can revert the changes done by them. --- Faisal 11:33, 9 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It would be great if someone can correct the section named The conquest of Mecca. --- Faisal 13:19, 18 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Correct to what?Timothy Usher 13:20, 18 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Islam in the Soviet Union

I've began Islam in the Soviet Union because, really, we just needed one.I'll work as much as I can on it, but it needs an expert! --Irishpunktom\^talk 22:36, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Were you intending that article to be from a historical perspective or did you mean to entitle it Islam in the former Soviet Union? Netscott 22:46, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Considering there has only ever been one Soviet union, I didn't think it would matter

Change it if you want! --Irishpunktom\^talk 22:49, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not raining on your parade... starting articles on Wikipedia is excellent but I just wondered about your perspective on the title 'tis all. Netscott 22:50, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think "former" is really necessary.For example, Christianity in the Former Roman Empire?

By the way, IPT's post exemplifies the kind of non-partisan article notices that are legitimate, constructive and desirable - exactly the kind of thing I'd like to see occuring on WikiProject Islam.Timothy Usher 22:54, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The original title would mean islam when/where the Soviet Union existed(an historical artical), and islam in the former soviet union would be a contempory article about those countires that are independant Now but used to be in the Soviet union.Hypnosadist 00:06, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Reading what User:Irishpunktom's got in the article (note to self: well duh, actually reading it might help) it's clear that it's meant as a historical perspective. Netscott 00:09, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hadith of Persians and knowledge

I am trying to work on some of the old articles i created and i though i could ask you for a opinion: How do you think i could improve this article? Thanks. --Striver 20:01, 9 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Islam

Assalamu Alaikum and Hello,

I propose that we, as a guild, concentrate on improving the Islam article until we're able to get it to featured status. BhaiSaab 06:16, 26 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

A section on Islamic Extremist Terrorism is currently being added, by certain people, onto the Islam article. Do you think it should it go there or not? Go to the talk page and voice your opinion. BhaiSaab ^talk 17:26, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Islamic terrorism There is currently a discussion going on as to whether the Islamic terrorist section I added to Islam here[9] belongs in the article or not, or indeed whether any mention of Islamic terrorism should be made. Your thoughts and input would be appreciated here. Dev920 18:04, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Shah Nimatullah

Article needing attention While on random article patrol, I found Shah Nimatullah, which needs attention from somebody knowledgable on the subject. Zocky | picture popups 17:53, 16 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Mutaween

Moved from Strivers talk page:

As salam alaikum. Have a look at mutaween - there is a lot of anti-Muslim bias here and this term is connected mainly with Saudi state, but some people are trying to expand it to the entire Muslim world! AlMuslimeen 05:17, 16 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Indonesian Mujahedeen Council

New stub added for this group, any help adding to this artical would be usful.Hypnosadist 13:29, 16 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Komando Jihad

New stub added for this group, any help adding to this artical would be usful.Hypnosadist 11:32, 18 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Portal:Islam

Please put this on your watchlist for vandalism, particularly Portal:Islam/Intro. BhaiSaab ^talk 19:09, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

An-Nisa

please see Talk:An-Nisa regarding a split proposal. --Striver 20:11, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Religion of Peace

That needs attention, something i can't affor right now. Try looking at the picture that was added recently. --Striver 13:02, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Qur'an

This article has been written in practical way and it is not categorized in academic way. Also the some parts are very weak. I want to rearrange and rewrite the article and put some comments in talk:Qur'an. Please come and help with me.--Sa.vakilian 02:53, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Animals in islam

Could need expansion. --Striver 23:41, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hygiene in Islam

Could need expansion. --Striver 00:47, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Khaybar

This article is a pov and inaccurate, i need help with this one, since i feel i can not correct the whole issue alone. --Striver 23:29, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

List of exported Arabic terms

Newly created, could use some expansion. --Striver 21:56, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Third holiest site in Islam AfD debate

I've nominated this article for deletion Third_holiest_site_in_Islam, and would appreciate any comments on the matter.--Amerique 22:22, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hadeeth Encyclopedia

Man, i hate to do this, but is Hadeeth Encyclopedia really encyclopedic? --Striver 08:49, 29 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The website is yet under construction and have problems. I think the article could be deleted now and created again later may be. Also when someone could get to individual books hadiths then why need that website. Everybody can submit hadith on it which is not that good idea too.--- ابراهيم 17:08, 29 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject Muslim scholars/collaboration

Guys, maybe you would like to join in and try to return the Avicenna article into GA Class? --Striver 23:03, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Mediation about Muhammad picture

If you are interesting in resolving dispute on Muhammad picture then please join the on going mediation at http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/Talk:Muhammad/Mediation . --- ابراهيم 09:41, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sunnipath.com

This article needs re-writing and a notability check. --Striver 14:09, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2006 November 13

regarding Family_tree_of_Umar. --Striver 16:43, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

History of Islam

Please improve the sections Africa and Asia in the article History of Islam.--Afrikiamld (talk) 16:33, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]