Wikipedia:WikiProject Chemistry/Image Request/Archive01

Fulfilled requests

edit
Done -- Do either of these suffice?     --Ed (Edgar181) 15:02, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
They look good to me --Quantockgoblin 11:24, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for that! I've assessed the article now. Would you agree? I'm not sure what else can possibly be added at the moment. --Rifleman 82 02:20, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

How are these?           --Ed (Edgar181) 15:29, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ed They are great - thanks for drawing them! The only improvement I could suggest is that instead of drawing the trivalent P-compounds as planer, you could draw them as tetrahedral with a lone pair as the final axis. --Quantockgoblin 18:51, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Ed, also I think it is more clear if the 1, 2 and 3 of the R-groups are given in superscript e.g. R1, R2 and R3 - subscript implies number of substituents.
Good suggestions. I've made the changes. --Ed (Edgar181) 12:51, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Job done! --Quantockgoblin 16:41, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed --Quantockgoblin 11:51, 23 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed --Ed (Edgar181) 22:00, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Here it is:   --Ed (Edgar181) 13:25, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
How's this?:  
Great, thanks. Quantockgoblin 10:05, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks - Quantockgoblin 10:39, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks - Quantockgoblin 16:54, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Done - see article. Ben 16:51, 20 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
--(Edgar181) 17:28, 19 January 2007 (UTC)  Ed[reply]
  • Iminium cation ([R1R2C=NR3R4]+), for that wiki page.
Done! Ben 13:15, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks -- Quantockgoblin 10:33, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

--Ed (Edgar181) 18:49, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
-- Job well done thanks -- Quantockgoblin 21:36, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • I think the numbering on the following need to be corrected:
 ,  ,  
I don't think the non-CH's should be given a new number, see Benzothiazole for an example:  
Heh. That's ChemSketch's auto numbering, not IUPAC numbering :/ I'll renumber them manually and change the orientation as well. Fvasconcellos 14:23, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
and whilst you're at it ... nice pretty 3D pic to go with them? -- Quantockgoblin 14:27, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
OK, corrected. I've tried to follow the rules but I'd still like them double-checked, just in case I screwed up again :) 3D models to come.
Tremendous - for a moment I though the Isoindoline was wrong but a Google image search agrees with you, and nice link to the naming rules - Quantockgoblin 16:44, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
OK. 3D models updated for indoline/isoindoline and created for benzothiophene, benzothiazole, benzoxazole and thiazole:

 ,  ,  ,   Fvasconcellos 18:14, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well done Fvasconcellos, I've updated the wiki pages with images, thanks --Quantockgoblin 09:51, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
How's this? Again, numbering was done by a human :), so please double check.     Fvasconcellos 14:12, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
By the way, that's 2,2':5',2''-terthiophene, the one described in the terthiophene infobox. There are plenty of other isomers, but I thought this should be the one. Fvasconcellos 14:14, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Looks good to me -- Quantockgoblin 17:24, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Both done.     Fvasconcellos 18:11, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
1,3-dioxolane done   Fvasconcellos 17:34, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Both done.     I believe Ben has done 3D models of these already. Fvasconcellos 18:11, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]