Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2021 November 1

< Wikipedia:Templates for discussion | Log
< October 31 November 2 >

November 1

edit

Template:Topical archive

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 03:22, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Only used in one place, Wikipedia:Topic archive. That page is marked as historical, so I see no way for this to acquire more uses. * Pppery * it has begun... 23:27, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:S-line/BJS left/19

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:10, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Somehow I missed a few unused S-line templates in my previous nomination, or these have become unused since that nomination. In any event, I am nominating this further batch of templates. These are all of the untranscluded Template:S-line subpages that have not been edited in 2021. Please see the previous nomination (closed as delete), this similar discussion from 2011, and this discussion confirming that these unused templates are unlikely to be used in the future, since the project is moving from {{S-line}} to {{Adjacent stations}}. – Jonesey95 (talk) 21:38, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Age verfication required

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:12, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and it be hard to go through which sources would require age verification. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:26, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Wikipedia articles with unclear gender progress

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G8 by Anomie (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 23:01, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template no longer used or needed after this Tfd from June 7. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:00, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:XuzhouM lines

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:12, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 19:49, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Xpd5opec

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete for multiple reasons:

AnomieBOT⚡ 13:11, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

All unused. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 19:49, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, they are part of a set of tools, see m:help:expansion demo templates. It is more practical to have them ready for use than to have to recreate them when they are needed. - Patrick (talk) 20:21, 1 November 2021 (UTC).[reply]
If you plan on using them, you should add them where they are needed, otherwise having them sitting around doesn't do any good. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:02, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have moved them to my user space. - Patrick (talk) 11:23, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:CCSouthSydneyRabbitohsLadder

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:13, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused standings template that is redundant as the main article has a more accurate listing in table format. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 19:31, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:CEOs of Microsoft

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:13, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and all articles are already listed on the main Microsoft template. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 19:28, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:CCBL seasons

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:14, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An unused template with no links as no articles exist for Cape Cod seasons. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 19:21, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Tennis at the Olympics

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:14, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. Redundant to Template:Infobox tennis tournament event Sod25 (talk) 18:28, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:After Tolkien navbox

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 17:21, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

basically unused Frietjes (talk) 17:07, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:RJL

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. Izno (talk) 17:20, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. * Pppery * it has begun... 15:35, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:C1YearInTopic

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 17:19, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused fork of the infobox already featured on the AD 50 article. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 15:25, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Hang on

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:40, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No longer used Lunacats (talk) 15:24, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Table section

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 17:17, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. * Pppery * it has begun... 15:20, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Sofia Metro M4 line

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:51, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused; incomplete fork of {{Sofia Metro 2}}. Mackensen (talk) 12:15, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Split suburban railway map

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:50, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused duplicate of {{Split suburban railway}}. Mackensen (talk) 12:04, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Phil Elverum

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:49, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is a template that transcludes two related navboxes. The only logical place to use them, Phil Elverum, just transcludes each of the two navboxes separately. This template is redundant and more opaque for editors who would want to modify it if it were placed somewhere. – Jonesey95 (talk) 07:17, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Hauntology (music)

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:49, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The only link to this template is Hauntology (music) not including the categories. At that article, Template:Hauntology is used instead, making Hauntology (music) redundant. This 2020 template was also made after the Hauntology template was made in 2017. MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 03:32, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Barkam weatherbox

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:49, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and redundant as the Barkam article already has weather information on it in table format. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 02:01, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Badgetemplate

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:48, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:57, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Babel field 0

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:48, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Both unused. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:57, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Branson TV

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:48, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and doesn't have any benefit. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:49, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Michelle Dilhara

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:48, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Templates for an actress that has nothing to do with the person itself other than lists her filmography. The series template is usually for politicians and remains unused. Not good use of template space. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:40, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Slovakia statistics templates

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete after substitution to ensure the extant data is not lost. Primefac (talk) 09:17, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This set of templates are used in a nested fashion to put statistics in articles about Slovakia, such as Abranovce. This presumably makes it easier for the author of Statistic of Slovak places by Dušan Kreheľ to update the stats from their website, which is used as the data source. It's great to have these statistics in Wikipedia, but unfortunately this nest of templates makes it difficult for other editors to improve the formatting, make corrections, or do their own updates. (For example, after poking around these templates for a few minutes, despite having edited Wikipedia for decades and writing bots myself, I couldn't figure out where the numbers are actually coming from.) I think the best thing to do would be to flatten out all this complexity by subst:ing all these templates (which as I discovered would have to be done recursively). For future mass updates, I think it would be better to have a bot dump formulaic prose in articles or infoboxes directly, which is what has been done for U.S. census results. -- Beland (talk) 00:30, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notified Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Slovakia and User talk:Dušan Kreheľ. -- Beland (talk) 00:43, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:BtcAddress

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:46, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A dead link to the blockchain website. Not a template and really it's just promotional nonsense. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:14, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete as unused. The link being dead is irrelevant, since it could be fixed (they just restructured the website it links to), and the template is not promoting anything by itself (as there could be legitimate links to bitcoin addresses; whether they are spam depends on context). But regardless, the lack of use is a sufficient reason for deletion. * Pppery * it has begun... 23:38, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wiki.x.io/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2021_November_1&oldid=1055099070"