Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2011 December 14

< December 13	December 15 >

December 14

Template:Ecology2

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete per WP:G7. Bulwersator (talk) 09:53, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Ecology2 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navbox Bulwersator (talk) 23:26, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I have notified WPEcology. 76.65.128.198 (talk) 05:32, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I put the template together as a draft. I was seeking feedback and ideas on it. It isn't all that good, so I'm okay with it being deleted.Thompsma (talk) 07:23, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:EU regulation

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:32, 25 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:EU regulation (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused infobox without documentation Bulwersator (talk) 23:23, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Early Morning

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:32, 25 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Early Morning (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navbox Bulwersator (talk) 23:22, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:East German novels

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete per WP:G7. Bulwersator (talk) 09:53, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:East German novels (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navbox Bulwersator (talk) 23:21, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No objections to deletion. It was a project I started, and then couldn't really follow up on. If it seems like a project worth taking up in the future, I'll make sure it has more entries, and is actually used. Sindinero (talk) 07:26, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Easter Island sidebar

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:37, 25 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Easter Island sidebar (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused duplicate of this construction Bulwersator (talk) 23:18, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to Template:Easter Island, so that editors can choose between footer and sidebar implementations. 76.65.128.198 (talk) 06:48, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Turkish cuisine/beveragealcohol

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:33, 25 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Turkish cuisine/beveragealcohol (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Turkish cuisine/beveragealcoholbeer&others (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Turkish cuisine/beveragealcoholhard (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Turkish cuisine/beveragealcoholwine (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Turkish cuisine/beveragenonalcohol (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Category:Turkey drink templates

unused after merger into template:Turkish cuisine/beverage. Frietjes (talk) 21:43, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Little Mix

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:38, 25 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Little Mix (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

WP:NENAN. Too early in their career to need to link these articles in a box, when they're all extensively linked in the articles anyway. Bencherlite ^Talk 19:17, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, not enough articles to make a navbox necessary. –anemone projectors– 14:55, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Certainly not enough articles, plus it can always be re-made once they have enough. --ƒɾɛɛᴅᴑᴍº ᵀᴬᴸᴷ 21:17, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: - I am just about to populate it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by World Flying (talk • contribs) 20:36, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Populate it with what? Even the "featured" single, they are not credited as a featured artist. --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars (talk) 20:59, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Certainly not enough articles, maybe in the future. JBoy02 (talk) 17:12, 23 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Dp-employee

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:39, 25 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Dp-employee (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Useless template, name looks like db deletion template, unlinked, unclear purpose, I attempted to delete it as test page. Bulwersator (talk) 18:22, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

delete, also yuck at HTML table instead of wikitable syntax. ~Alison C. (Crazytales) 14:24, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:RMRA

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:40, 25 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:RMRA (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused route template, I was unable to locate corresponding article Bulwersator (talk) 14:29, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:RHCPCOTWCurrent

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:40, 25 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:RHCPCOTWCurrent (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused template (this project is dead) Bulwersator (talk) 14:28, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:RHI99Bracket

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:41, 25 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:RHI99Bracket (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, purpose unclear Bulwersator (talk) 14:27, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:RHIPlayoffs96

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:41, 25 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:RHIPlayoffs96 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, purpose unclear Bulwersator (talk) 14:27, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Rossini operas (horizontal)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete per WP:G7. Bulwersator (talk) 09:53, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Rossini operas (horizontal) (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navbox Bulwersator (talk) 14:23, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete It was an experiment in 2009 to cope with lengthy lists in the (then) uncollapsible vertical composer navboxes. It has been superceded by the collapsible vertical version Template:Rossini operas. – Voceditenore (talk) 14:49, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Chinese identification cards

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete after merging with Identity document. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:49, 25 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Chinese identification cards (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Boxcruft. 42.3.2.18 (talk) 09:39, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm somewhat surprised we don't have a navbox for {{identification cards}} in general, given that it's a fairly standard format of article. I agree that there's no pressing need to have one for less than a handful of said cards for a particular juristiction. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 10:06, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- With all due respect, these are three separate jurisdictions, under the sovereignty of one sovereign state. The two dependent territories are separate jurisdictions and have their own constitutional power to impose immigration controls. 42.3.2.18 (talk) 10:18, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Perhaps a list, a category, or the {{continent topic}} series will do. We don't need specific templates. There's no reason to have them. 42.3.2.18 (talk) 10:44, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Listify, merge into Identity cards and redirect. 61.18.170.71 (talk) 04:39, 20 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Dramedy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete per WP:G7. — This, that, and the other (talk) 00:38, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Dramedy (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Useless, unused template. Bulwersator (talk) 09:35, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I don't remember the context for this template. Feel free to speedy as G7 if you want. --MZMcBride (talk) 20:40, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Dravidian Kingdoms

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:42, 25 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Dravidian Kingdoms (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navbox Bulwersator (talk) 09:13, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:DramaDesk MusicalFeaturedActor

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:DramaDesk MusicalFeaturedActor (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navbox Bulwersator (talk) 09:12, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

oppose: templete is currently in use. --emerson7 10:32, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Ops. Sorry. Bulwersator (talk) 14:24, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Dragon Gate Championship

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:43, 25 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Dragon Gate Championship (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navbox without main article Bulwersator (talk) 09:11, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Dr. Dobb's Journal

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:43, 25 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Dr. Dobb's Journal (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, way too specific Bulwersator (talk) 09:10, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete boilerplate; exceeding specific, and not helpfully named, since it is not a general DDJ template, but a specific page in a volume. 76.65.128.198 (talk) 05:36, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Donizetti operas (horizontal)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was speedy delete per G7. Frietjes (talk) 16:32, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Donizetti operas (horizontal) (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navbox Bulwersator (talk) 09:09, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: There's also {{Rossini operas (horizontal)}}. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 11:54, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Nominated Bulwersator (talk) 14:25, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete both They were an experiment in 2009 to cope with the lengthy lists in the (then) uncollapsible vertical composer navboxes. They have been superceded by the collapsible vertical versions Template:Donizetti operas and Template:Rossini operas. – Voceditenore (talk) 14:42, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Merge both into the other versions, so that editors can choose between horizontal and vertical presentations, with a parameter switch (such as "|orientation=horizontal") 76.65.128.198 (talk) 05:39, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Donnellynav

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:45, 25 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Donnellynav (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navbox Bulwersator (talk) 09:09, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete navigates between two articles. (and a third that is only tangentially related) 76.65.128.198 (talk) 05:37, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Double succession

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:46, 25 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Double succession (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, without documentation, probably duplicate of working template. Bulwersator (talk) 09:08, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Don't edit this line authority

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:46, 25 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Don't edit this line authority (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, purpose unclear Bulwersator (talk) 09:07, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.